Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33256091›Full record

ArticleGenes2020

A Synthetic Strong and Constitutive Promoter Derived from the

Larisa N Efremova, Svetlana R Strelnikova, Guzel R Gazizova, Elena A Minkina, Roman A Komakhin

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Larisa N EfremovaAll-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, Moscow 127550, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1579-438X
Svetlana R StrelnikovaAll-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, Moscow 127550, Russia.
Guzel R GazizovaInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan 420008, Russia.
Elena A MinkinaInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan 420008, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1441-0372
Roman A KomakhinAll-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, Moscow 127550, Russia.
All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Food Biotechnology · RUKazan Federal University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic promoters are vital for genetic engineering-based strategies for crop improvement, but effective methodologies for their creation and systematic testing are lacking. We report here on the comparative analysis of the promoters pro-SmAMP1 and pro-SmAMP2 from

Indexed as

AgrobacteriumArabidopsis ProteinsBase SequenceCarboxypeptidasesCaulimovirusGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, ReporterNicotianaPlant LeavesPlant ProteinsPlants, Genetically ModifiedPromoter Regions, GeneticStellariaTranscription Initiation SiteTranscriptomeTransgenesAMP1 protein, ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCarboxypeptidasesPlant ProteinsACTCAT cis-elementgene expressiongenetic transformationGUSnptIIsynthetic promoter

Identifiers

PMID33256091
PMCPMC7760760
OpenAlexW3109855060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.