Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33256081›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Combining High-Pressure Perturbation with NMR Spectroscopy for a Structural and Dynamical Characterization of Protein Folding Pathways.

Cécile Dubois, Isaline Herrada, Philippe Barthe, Christian Roumestand

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Protein Unfolded State: One, No One and One Hundred Thousand.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cécile DuboisCentre de Biochimie Structurale, INSERM U1054, CNRS UMR 5048, Université de Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Isaline HerradaCentre de Biochimie Structurale, INSERM U1054, CNRS UMR 5048, Université de Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Philippe BartheCentre de Biochimie Structurale, INSERM U1054, CNRS UMR 5048, Université de Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4282-6604
Christian RoumestandCentre de Biochimie Structurale, INSERM U1054, CNRS UMR 5048, Université de Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4082-3293
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-hydrostatic pressure is an alternative perturbation method that can be used to destabilize globular proteins. Generally perfectly reversible, pressure exerts local effects on regions or domains of a protein containing internal voids, contrary to heat or chemical denaturant that destabilize protein structures uniformly. When combined with NMR spectroscopy, high pressure (HP) allows one to monitor at a residue-level resolution the structural transitions occurring upon unfolding and to determine the kinetic properties of the process. The use of HP-NMR has long been hampered by technical difficulties. Owing to the recent development of commercially available high-pressure sample cells, HP-NMR experiments can now be routinely performed. This review summarizes recent advances of HP-NMR techniques for the characterization at a quasi-atomic resolution of the protein folding energy landscape.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyModels, MolecularPressureProtein ConformationProtein FoldingHydrostatic PressureKineticsModels, TheoreticalProteinsProtein UnfoldingStructure-Activity RelationshipThermodynamicsProteinsHigh Hydrostatic PressureNMRprotein folding

Identifiers

PMID33256081
PMCPMC7731413
OpenAlexW3107518727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.