ArticleGenes2020
Profiling Novel Alternative Splicing within Multiple Tissues Provides Useful Insights into Porcine Genome Annotation.
Article in Genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Characterization of Alternative Splicing Events in Porcine Skeletal Muscles with Different Intramuscular Fat Contents.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- TwoGenes · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alternative splicing (AS) is a process during gene expression that results in a single gene coding for different protein variants. AS contributes to transcriptome and proteome diversity. In order to characterize AS in pigs, genome-wide transcripts and AS events were detected using RNA sequencing of 34 different tissues in Duroc pigs. In total, 138,403 AS events and 29,270 expressed genes were identified. An alternative donor site was the most common AS form and accounted for 44% of the total AS events. The percentage of the other three AS forms (exon skipping, alternative acceptor site, and intron retention) was approximately 19%. The results showed that the most common AS events involving alternative donor sites could produce different transcripts or proteins that affect the biological processes. The expression of genes with tissue-specific AS events showed that gene functions were consistent with tissue functions. AS increased proteome diversity and resulted in novel proteins that gained or lost important functional domains. In summary, these findings extend porcine genome annotation and highlight roles that AS could play in determining tissue identity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.