ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Observability Analysis and Observer Design for a Nonlinear Three-Tank System: Theory and Experiments.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper addresses the observability analysis and observer design for a nonlinear interacting three-tank system. The plant configuration is first described using the process and instrumentation diagram (P&ID) and a state-space realization is derived; some insights about the behavior of the nonlinear system, considering equilibrium points and the phase portrait are provided. Then, observability in the Hermann-Krener sense is analyzed. A high-gain observer (HGO) is then designed, using the equivalence of the original state-space realization with its observability canonical form, in order to guarantee convergence of the state estimation. The performance was validated through simulation and experiments in a multipurpose plant equipped with real sensors; the HGO response was compared to a Luenberger observer (for a linear approximation of the plant) and the Extended Kalman Filter (for which convergence is not guaranteed), considering nonlinearities, interaction, disturbances and noise. Theoretical and experimental results show that the HGO can provide robust estimation and disturbance rejection, despite the sensitivity of HGOs to noisy variables in processes such as level of liquids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.