Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33255672›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Community Pharmacies in Poland-The Journey from a Deregulated to a Strictly Regulated Market.

Marcin Wiśniewski, Urszula Religioni, Piotr Merks

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Patient Perceptions on Receiving Vaccination Services through Community Pharmacies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Public Perception of Pharmacists in Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Assessment of Pharmacists' Willingness to Conduct Medication Use Reviews in Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marcin WiśniewskiAssociation of Pharmacists of Employers of Polish Pharmacies, 01-711 Warsaw, Poland.
Urszula ReligioniCollegium of Business Administration, Warsaw School of Economics, 02-513 Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr MerksCardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8966-3799
Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz · PLSGH Warsaw School of Economics · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community pharmacies are the primary entities providing drugs to individual patients in Poland. The pharmacy market has been changing for many years due to significant changes in market regulations. These changes significantly affect the profitability of pharmacies, which may impact the quality of pharmacotherapy. The small number of pharmacies, which resulted from changes in the law in 2017, can influence the level of patient care. The article presents the community pharmacies market in Poland. Particular attention is paid to the legal regulations affecting community pharmacies and the impact of these regulations on the overall shape of the market. The Polish system's specificity, including the pharmacy market indicators, has been compared with data from other European Union countries.

Indexed as

Drug and Narcotic ControlPharmaciesEuropean UnionHumansPolandcommunity pharmacypharmacistpharmacy marketpharmacy regulations

Identifiers

PMID33255672
PMCPMC7728088
OpenAlexW3109958870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.