Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33255551›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Psychological Burden in Meningioma Patients under a Wait-and-Watch Strategy and after Complete Resection Is High-Results of a Prospective Single Center Study.

Darius Kalasauskas, Naureen Keric, Salman Abu Ajaj, Leoni von Cube, Florian Ringel, Mirjam Renovanz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Darius KalasauskasDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Naureen KericDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Salman Abu AjajDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Leoni von CubeDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Florian RingelDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3132-7543
Mirjam RenovanzDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2824-3720

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of intracranial meningiomas as incidental findings is increasing by growing availability of MRI diagnostics. However, the psychological distress of patients with incidental meningiomas under a wait-and-watch strategy is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to compare the psychosocial situation of meningioma patients under wait-and-watch to patients after complete resection to bridge this gap. The inclusion criteria for the prospective monocenter study were either an incidental meningioma under a wait-and-watch strategy or no neurologic deficits after complete resection. Sociodemographic, clinical, and health-related quality of life and clinical data were assessed. Psychosocial factors were measured by the Distress Thermometer (DT), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), and the Short Form (SF-36). A total of 62 patients were included (n = 51 female, mean age 61 (SD 13) years). According to HADS, the prevalence of anxiety was 45% in the postoperative and 42% in the wait-and-watch group (

Indexed as

anxietydepressionmeningiomapsychological distressquality of lifesurgerywait-and-watch

Identifiers

PMID33255551
PMCPMC7761113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.