ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2020
The Macro- and Micro-Mechanics of the Colon and Rectum II: Theoretical and Computational Methods.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Colorectum and embedded networks of nerve fibers present auxetic responses during uniaxial circumferential extension.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Article
- Methods for quantitative analyses of nerve fiber deformation in the myenteric plexus under loading of mouse distal colon and rectum.Medical engineering & physics · 2025Article
- Development of an Anisotropic Hyperelastic Material Model for Porcine Colorectal Tissues.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Mechanobiological considerations in colorectal stapling: Implications for technology development.Surgery open science · 2023Review
- Biomechanics of Hollow Organs: Experimental Testing and Computational Modeling.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Biomechanics Assist Measurement, Modeling, Engineering Applications, and Clinical Decision Making in Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Toward Elucidating the Physiological Impacts of Residual Stresses in the Colorectum.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Abnormal colorectal biomechanics and mechanotransduction associate with an array of gastrointestinal diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, diverticula disease, anorectal disorders, ileus, and chronic constipation. Visceral pain, principally evoked from mechanical distension, has a unique biomechanical component that plays a critical role in mechanotransduction, the process of encoding mechanical stimuli to the colorectum by sensory afferents. To fully understand the underlying mechanisms of visceral mechanical neural encoding demands focused attention on the macro- and micro-mechanics of colon tissue. Motivated by biomechanical experiments on the colon and rectum, increasing efforts focus on developing constitutive frameworks to interpret and predict the anisotropic and nonlinear biomechanical behaviors of the multilayered colorectum. We will review the current literature on computational modeling of the colon and rectum as well as the mechanical neural encoding by stretch sensitive afferent endings, and then highlight our recent advances in these areas. Current models provide insight into organ- and tissue-level biomechanics as well as the stretch-sensitive afferent endings of colorectal tissues yet an important challenge in modeling theory remains. The research community has not connected the biomechanical models to those of mechanosensitive nerve endings to create a cohesive multiscale framework for predicting mechanotransduction from organ-level biomechanics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.