Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33255460›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Co-Creating and Evaluating an App-Based Well-Being Intervention: The HOW (Healthier Outcomes at Work) Social Work Project.

Jermaine M Ravalier, Elaine Wainwright, Nina Smyth, Oliver Clabburn, Paulina Wegrzynek, Mark Loon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Perception of the activity-based working concept by bank's employees as a working condition.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jermaine M RavalierNewton Park Campus, School of Science, Bath Spa University, Bath BA29BN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8418-4841
Elaine WainwrightNewton Park Campus, School of Science, Bath Spa University, Bath BA29BN, UK.
Nina SmythSchool of Social Sciences, Psychology, University of Westminster, London W1W 6UW, UK.
Oliver ClabburnWellcome Centre for Cultures and Environments of Health, Streatham Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QH, UK.
Paulina WegrzynekNewton Park Campus, School of Science, Bath Spa University, Bath BA29BN, UK.
Mark LoonNewton Park Campus, School of Science, Bath Spa University, Bath BA29BN, UK.

Funding

Department for Work and Pensions / Department for Health and Social Care Challenge Fund 100038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stress and mental health at work are the leading causes of long-term sickness absence in the UK, with chronically poor working conditions impacting employee physiological and psychological health. Social workers play a significant part in the fabric of UK society, but have one of the most stressful occupations in the country. The aim of this project was to work with UK social workers to co-develop, implement, and evaluate a series of smartphone-based mental health initiatives. A Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach, consisting of semi-structured interviews and focus group and steering group discussions, was utilized to design the mental health and well-being interventions. Study efficacy was evaluated via a pre- and post-intervention survey and post-intervention semi-structured interviews. Interventions developed were psycho-educational, improved top-down and bottom-up communication, and provided access to a Vocational Rehabilitation Assistant for those struggling and at risk of sickness absence. Six months following dissemination, surveys demonstrated significant improvements in communication, and mean score improvements in four other working conditions. This project, therefore, demonstrates that co-developed initiatives can be positively impactful, despite post-intervention data collection being impacted by COVID-19. Future studies should build upon these findings and broaden the PAR approach nationally while taking a robust approach to evaluation.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental HealthMobile ApplicationsDelivery of Health CareHumansOccupational StressPandemicsSmartphoneSocial WorkersUnited Kingdomappinterventionmental healthstresswell-beingworking conditions

Identifiers

PMID33255460
PMCPMC7727806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.