Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33255388›Full record

ArticleAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Biological Effects of Scattered Versus Scanned Proton Beams on Normal Tissues in Total Body Irradiated Mice: Survival, Genotoxicity, Oxidative Stress and Inflammation.

Samia Chaouni, Alexandre Leduc, Frédéric Pouzoulet, Ludovic De Marzi, Frédérique Megnin-Chanet, Dinu Stefan, Jean-Louis Habrand, François Sichel, Carine Laurent

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Samia ChaouniCancer Centre François Baclesse, Normandy University, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE-EA4651, 14076 Caen, France.
Alexandre LeducCancer Centre François Baclesse, Normandy University, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE-EA4651, 14076 Caen, France.
Frédéric PouzouletTranslational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 91401 Orsay, France.
Ludovic De MarziRadiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre University, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 91898 Orsay, France.
Frédérique Megnin-ChanetINSERM U1196/CNRS UMR 9187, Institut Curie-Recherche, University Paris-Saclay, 91405 Orsay, France.
Dinu StefanCancer Centre François Baclesse, Normandy University, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE-EA4651, 14076 Caen, France.
Jean-Louis HabrandCancer Centre François Baclesse, Normandy University, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE-EA4651, 14076 Caen, France.
François SichelCancer Centre François Baclesse, Normandy University, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE-EA4651, 14076 Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4094-7739
Carine LaurentCancer Centre François Baclesse, Normandy University, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE-EA4651, 14076 Caen, France.
Université de Rouen Normandie · FRCentre François Baclesse · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FRUniversité Paris Sciences et Lettres · FR

Funding

Cancéropole Nord-Ouest ESPRITSÉlectricité de France RB2018-07National Research Agency under the Programme Investissements d'Avenir - Institut Carnot ANR-11CARN-008-01Normandy County Council and the European Union in the framework of the ERDF-ESF operation programme 2014-2020 ESPRITS and PMRT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Side effects of proton therapy are poorly studied. Moreover, the differences in the method of dose delivery on normal tissues are not taken into account when proton beams are scanned instead of being scattered. We proposed here to study the effects of both modalities of proton beam delivery on blood; skin; lung and heart in a murine model. In that purpose; C57BL/6 mice were total body irradiated by 190.6 MeV proton beams either by Double Scattering (DS) or by Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) in the plateau phase before the Bragg Peak. Mouse survival was evaluated. Blood and organs were removed three months after irradiation. Biomarkers of genotoxicity; oxidative stress and inflammation were measured. Proton irradiation was shown to increase lymphocyte micronucleus frequency; lung superoxide dismutase activity; erythrocyte and skin glutathione peroxidase activity; erythrocyte catalase activity; lung; heart and skin oxidized glutathione level; erythrocyte and lung lipid peroxidation and erythrocyte protein carbonylation even 3 months post-irradiation. When comparing both methods of proton beam delivery; mouse survival was not different. However, PBS significantly increased lymphocyte micronucleus frequency; erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase activity and heart oxidized glutathione level compared to DS. These results point out the necessity to take into account the way of delivering dose in PT as it could influence late side effects.

Indexed as

double scatteringgenotoxicityhealthy tissuesinflammationmiceoxidative stresspencil beam scanningproton therapyside effects

Identifiers

PMID33255388
PMCPMC7761103
OpenAlexW3109900064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.