Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33255368›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

Risk and Response-Adapted Treatment in Multiple Myeloma.

Titouan Cazaubiel, Olga Mulas, Lydia Montes, Anaïs Schavgoulidze, Hervé Avet-Loiseau, Jill Corre, Aurore Perrot

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Role of DNA Repair in Genomic Instability of Multiple Myeloma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Titouan CazaubielHematology Department, University Hospital, 33600 Bordeaux, France.
Olga MulasHematology Unit, Businco Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy.
Lydia MontesHematology Department, University Hospital, 80054 Amiens, France.
Anaïs SchavgoulidzeCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Toulouse, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1037, 31059 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5526-4279
Hervé Avet-LoiseauCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Toulouse, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1037, 31059 Toulouse, France.
Jill CorreCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Toulouse, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1037, 31059 Toulouse, France.
Aurore PerrotCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Toulouse, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1037, 31059 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0131-8689

Funding

Targeting Genomic Instability and Evolution in MyelomaP01CA155258 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Jill Corre · 2011 to 2026
$32.5M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA155258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myeloma therapeutic strategies have been adapted to patients' age and comorbidities for a long time. However, although cytogenetics and clinical presentations (plasmablastic cytology; extramedullary disease) are major prognostic factors, until recently, all patients received the same treatment whatever their initial risk. No strong evidence allows us to use a personalized treatment according to one cytogenetic abnormality in newly diagnosed myeloma. Retrospective studies showed a benefit of a double autologous transplant in high-risk cytogenetics according to the International Myeloma Working Group definition (t(4;14), t(14;16) or del(17p)). Moreover, this definition has to be updated since other independent abnormalities, namely gain 1q, del(1p32), and trisomies 5 or 21, as well as TP53 mutations, are also prognostic. Another very strong predictive tool is the response to treatment assessed by the evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD). We are convinced that the time has come to use it to adapt the strategy to a dynamic risk. Many trials are ongoing to answer many questions: when and how should we adapt the therapy, its intensity and duration. Nevertheless, we also have to take into account the clinical outcome for one patient, especially adverse events affecting his or her quality of life and his or her preferences for continuous/fixed duration treatment.

Indexed as

cytogeneticsmultiple myelomapersonalized therapyresponse-adapted treatment

Identifiers

PMID33255368
PMCPMC7760158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.