Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33255161›Full record

ReviewPharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2020

The Contribution of the Humanities and Social Sciences to Pharmacy Education: Literature Review and Perspectives.

Caroline Boulliat, Emily Darlington, Marie-Ange Faure, Bernard Massoubre, Claude Dussart

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caroline BoulliatPharmacie à Usage Intérieur and Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Desgenettes, 69003 Lyon, France.
Emily DarlingtonLaboratoire Parcours Santé Systémique (P2S) EA 4129 and Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69372 Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8671-2022
Marie-Ange FaurePharmacie à Usage Intérieur and Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Desgenettes, 69003 Lyon, France.
Bernard MassoubrePharmacie à Usage Intérieur and Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Desgenettes, 69003 Lyon, France.
Claude DussartPharmacie et Stérilisation Centrales and Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69230 Sainte-Genis-Laval, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1091-9139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare systems worldwide adapt to patients' needs and expectations, following social evolutions. Pharmaceutical practice has shifted towards activities such as therapeutic education. Such new missions require to prioritize human and social sciences, which now play a predominant role in training.

objectiveThis work consists of assessing the contribution of human and social sciences to the field of pharmacy, with a twofold focus on practice and training.

methodA literature review was carried out according to the PRISMA guidelines focusing on the last 10 years. Selected full texts were read and analyzed to elicit the contribution of human and social sciences to pharmacy.

resultsOverall 36 articles were included. Three specific topics were identified during an inductive process of full text analysis: public health policy, patient care, and interprofessional collaboration.

conclusionsAlthough human and social sciences are essential to the evolution of the pharmacist profession, their impact on health care costs remains difficult to evaluate. Moreover, teaching human and social sciences can prove difficult to standardize. Such approaches must be supported and organized by governments and universities with a view of upscaling practices.

Indexed as

educationpharmacyprofessional trainingsocial sciences

Identifiers

PMID33255161
PMCPMC7712405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.