Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33254266›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2020

Active Versus Expectant Management for Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes at 34-36 Weeks of Gestation and the Associated Adverse Perinatal Outcomes.

Malú Flôres Ferraz, Thaísa De Souza Lima, Sarah Moura Cintra, Edward Araujo Júnior, Caetano Galvão Petrini, Mario Sergio Silva Gomes Caetano, Marina Carvalho Paschoini, Alberto Borges Peixoto

Open access · diamondAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Malú Flôres FerrazDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5362-8158
Thaísa De Souza LimaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8907-9816
Sarah Moura CintraService of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Universitário Mário Palmério, Universidade de Uberaba, Uberaba, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0261-6023
Edward Araujo JúniorDepartment of Obstetrics, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6145-2532
Caetano Galvão PetriniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9589-0004
Mario Sergio Silva Gomes CaetanoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6474-3511
Marina Carvalho PaschoiniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2218-4747
Alberto Borges PeixotoService of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Universitário Mário Palmério, Universidade de Uberaba, Uberaba, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1655-3609
Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro · BRUniversidade de Uberaba · BRUniversidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the type of management (active versus expectant) for preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) between 34 and 36 + 6 weeks of gestation and the associated adverse perinatal outcomes in 2 tertiary hospitals in the southeast of Brazil.

methodsIn the present retrospective cohort study, data were obtained by reviewing the medical records of patients admitted to two tertiary centers with different protocols for PPROM management. The participants were divided into two groups based on PPROM management: group I (active) and group II (expectant). For statistical analysis, the Student

resultsOf the 118 participants included, 78 underwent active (group I) and 40 expectant management (group II). Compared with group II, group I had significantly lower mean amniotic fluid index (5.5 versus 11.3 cm,

conclusionThere was no association between active versus expectant management in pregnant women with PPROM between 34 and 36 + 6 weeks of gestation and adverse perinatal outcomes.

Indexed as

Prenatal CareWatchful WaitingAdolescentAdultBrazilCohort StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleGestational AgeHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePremature Rupture of Fetal MembranesRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care CentersYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33254266
PMCPMC10309234
OpenAlexW3110426954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.