Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33254134›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics2021

Thalamic deep brain stimulation for acquired dystonia in children and young adults: a phase 1 clinical trial.

Marta San Luciano, Amy Robichaux-Viehoever, Kristen A Dodenhoff, Melissa L Gittings, Aaron C Viser, Caroline A Racine, Ian O Bledsoe, Christa Watson Pereira, Sarah S Wang, Philip A Starr and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03078816 (Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Secondary Dystonia in Children and Young Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03078816 nacompletednot on this map

Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Secondary Dystonia in Children and Young Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2017 to 2019Enrolled5ConditionsDystoniaArmsActiva PC Primary Cell Neurostimulator - (Model 37601), Activa RC Rechargeable Neurostimulator - (Model 37612), Activa SC Single Cell Neurostimulator (Models 37602/37603), DBS Lead - (Model 3387, DBS Extension - (Models 37085/6)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Thalamic deep brain stimulation improves movement in a cerebellar model of lesion-based status dystonicus.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marta San Luciano1Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, and.
Amy Robichaux-Viehoever2Department of Neurology, Division of Child Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri.
Kristen A Dodenhoff1Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, and.
Melissa L Gittings1Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, and.
Aaron C Viser1Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, and.
Caroline A Racine3Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; and.
Ian O Bledsoe1Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, and.
Christa Watson Pereira1Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, and.
Sarah S Wang1Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, and.
Philip A Starr3Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; and.
Jill L Ostrem1Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, and.
Center for Neurosciences · USNeurological Surgery · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Translating discoveries in neurological diseases of infancy and childhoodK12NS001692 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FULLERTON, HEATHER J · 1993 to 2018
$6.4M
Cerebellar deep brain stimulation for severe combined movement disorders and spasticity in children and young adults with cerebral palsyUH3NS128297 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Marta San Luciano · 2024 to 2026
$3.1M
Optimizing Phenogenotypic and Neuromodulation Predictors in Deep BrainStimulation Surgery for Isolated DystoniaK23NS099441 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SAN LUCIANO, MARTA · 2017 to 2021
$1000k
NINDS NIH HHS K12 NS001692NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS099441NINDS NIH HHS UH3 NS128297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy and safety of combined bilateral ventralis oralis posterior/ventralis intermedius (Vop/Vim) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of acquired dystonia in children and young adults. Pallidal DBS is efficacious for severe, medication-refractory isolated dystonia, providing 50%-60% long-term improvement. Unfortunately, pallidal stimulation response rates in acquired dystonia are modest and unpredictable, with frequent nonresponders. Acquired dystonia, most commonly caused by cerebral palsy, is more common than isolated dystonia in pediatric populations and is more recalcitrant to standard treatments. Given the limitations of pallidal DBS in acquired dystonia, there is a need to explore alternative brain targets. Preliminary evidence has suggested that thalamic stimulation may be efficacious for acquired dystonia.

methodsFour participants, 3 with perinatal brain injuries and 1 with postencephalitic symptomatic dystonia, underwent bilateral Vop/Vim DBS and bimonthly evaluations for 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) and Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale (BADS) scores between the baseline and 12-month assessments. Video documentation was used for blinded ratings. Secondary outcomes included evaluation of spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale score), quality of life (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory [PedsQL] and modified Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part II [UPDRS-II] scores), and neuropsychological assessments. Adverse events were monitored for safety.

resultsAll participants tolerated the procedure well, and there were no safety concerns or serious adverse events. There was an average improvement of 21.5% in the BFMDRS motor subscale score, but the improvement was only 1.6% according to the BADS score. Following blinded video review, dystonia severity ratings were even more modest. Secondary outcomes, however, were more encouraging, with the BFMDRS disability subscale score improving by 15.7%, the PedsQL total score by 27%, and the modified UPDRS-II score by 19.3%. Neuropsychological assessment findings were unchanged 1 year after surgery.

conclusionsBilateral thalamic neuromodulation by DBS for severe, medication-refractory acquired dystonia was well tolerated. Primary and secondary outcomes showed highly variable treatment effect sizes comparable to those of pallidal stimulation in this population. As previously described, improvements in quality of life and disability were not reflected in dystonia severity scales, suggesting a need for the development of scales specifically for acquired dystonia.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT03078816 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Indexed as

ThalamusAdolescentBrain InjuriesChildDeep Brain StimulationDisability EvaluationDystoniaFeasibility StudiesFemaleGlobus PallidusHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeVentral Thalamic NucleiDBSdeep brain stimulationdystoniafunctional neurosurgerypediatricthalamic

Identifiers

PMID33254134
PMCPMC8155109
OpenAlexW3106593151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.