Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33253199›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Biochar and compost effects on soil microbial communities and nitrogen induced respiration in turfgrass soils.

Muhammad Azeem, Lauren Hale, Jonathan Montgomery, David Crowley, Milton E McGiffen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Carbon Sequestration in Turfgrass-Soil Systems.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Muhammad AzeemNingbo Urban Environment Observation and Research Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, China.
Lauren HaleUSDA, Agricultural Research Service, San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center, Parlier, California, United States of America.
Jonathan MontgomeryDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California, United States of America.
David CrowleyDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California, United States of America.
Milton E McGiffenDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9867-0819
University of California, Riverside · USAgricultural Research Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the effect of a labile soil amendment, compost, and recalcitrant biochar on soil microbial community structure, diversity, and activity during turfgrass establishment. Two application rates of biochar (B1 at 12.5 t ha-1and B2 at 25 t ha-1), a 5 centimeter (cm) green waste compost treatment (CM) in top soil, a treatment with 12.5 t ha-1 biochar and 5 cm compost (B1+CM), and an unamended control (CK) treatment were prepared and seeded with tall fescue. Overall, results of phospholipid fatty acid analysis (PLFA) profiling and Illumina high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA genes amplified from soil DNA revealed significant shifts in microbial community structures in the compost amended soils whereas in biochar amended soils communities were more similar to the control, unamended soil. Similarly, increases in enzymatic rates (6-56%) and nitrogen-induced respiration (94%) were all largest in compost amended soils, with biochar amended soils exhibiting similar patterns to the control soils. Both biochar and compost amendments impacted microbial community structures and functions, but compost amendment, whether applied alone or co-applied with biochar, exhibited the strongest shifts in the microbial community metrics examined. Our results suggest application of compost to soils in need of microbiome change (reclamation projects) or biochar when the microbiome is functioning and long-term goals such as carbon sequestration are more desirable.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSoil MicrobiologyBacteriaCharcoalCompostingFungiHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationNitrogenPoaceaeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilbiocharCharcoalNitrogenRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil

Identifiers

PMID33253199
PMCPMC7703933
OpenAlexW3109449174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.