Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33253179›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Development of a sensitive molecular diagnostic assay for detecting Borrelia burgdorferi DNA from the blood of Lyme disease patients by digital PCR.

Srirupa Das, Denise Hammond-McKibben, Donna Guralski, Sandra Lobo, Paul N Fiedler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The New England journal of medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Borrelia surface proteins: new horizons in Lyme disease diagnosis.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Developing a Prospective Gestational Lyme Disease Study.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Molecular detection of Spirochetes andOpen veterinary journal · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Quantitative multiplexed strategies for human Lyme disease serological testing.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Srirupa DasDepartment of Pathology Research, Nuvance Health, Danbury, CT, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3500-8040
Denise Hammond-McKibbenDepartment of Pathology Research, Nuvance Health, Danbury, CT, United States of America.
Donna GuralskiDepartment of Pathology Research, Nuvance Health, Danbury, CT, United States of America.
Sandra LoboRudy L. Ruggles Biomedical Research Institute, Nuvance Health, Danbury, CT, United States of America.
Paul N FiedlerDepartment of Pathology Research, Nuvance Health, Danbury, CT, United States of America.
Biomedical Research Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lyme disease patients would greatly benefit from a timely, sensitive, and specific molecular diagnostic test that can detect the causal agent Borrelia burgdorferi at the onset of symptoms. Currently available diagnostic methods recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for Lyme disease involve indirect serological tests that rely on the detection of a host-antibody response, which often takes more than three weeks to develop. With this process, many positive cases are not detected within a timely manner, preventing a complete cure. In this study, we have developed a digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay that detects Lyme disease on clinical presentation with a sensitivity two-fold higher than that of the currently available diagnostic methods, using a cohort of patient samples collected from the Lyme disease endemic state of Connecticut, USA, in 2016-2018. Digital PCR technology was chosen as it is more advanced and sensitive than other PCR techniques in detecting rare targets. The analytical detection sensitivity of this diagnostic assay is approximately three genome copies of B. burgdorferi. The paucity of spirochetes in the bloodstream of Lyme disease patients has hindered the clinical adoption of PCR-based diagnostic tests. However, this drawback was overcome by using a comparatively larger sample volume, applying pre-analytical processing to the blood samples, and implementing a pre-amplification step to enrich for B. burgdorferi-specific gene targets before the patient samples are analyzed via digital PCR technology. Pre-analytical processing of blood samples from acute patients revealed that the best sample type for Lyme disease detection is platelet-rich plasma rather than whole blood. If detected in a timely manner, Lyme disease can be completely cured, thus limiting antibiotic overuse and associated morbidities.

Indexed as

Borrelia burgdorferiDNA, BacterialHumansLyme DiseaseMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionSerologic TestsDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID33253179
PMCPMC7703891
OpenAlexW3106770733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.