ArticlePloS one2020
Development of a sensitive molecular diagnostic assay for detecting Borrelia burgdorferi DNA from the blood of Lyme disease patients by digital PCR.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Borrelia surface proteins: new horizons in Lyme disease diagnosis.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Using Digital PCR to Unravel the Occurrence of Piroplasmids,Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Nested PCR amplification of the mitochondrial hypervariable region for non-invasive eDNA detection of Cryptobranchus alleganiensis.PloS one · 2025Article
- Developing a Prospective Gestational Lyme Disease Study.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Direct Detection of Lyme Borrelia: Recent Advancement and Use of Aptamer Technology.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Molecular detection of Spirochetes andOpen veterinary journal · 2023Article
- Development of a Syndromic Molecular Diagnostic Assay for Tick-Borne Pathogens Using Barcoded Magnetic Bead Technology.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Advances in the application of molecular diagnostic techniques for the detection of infectious disease pathogens (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2023Review
- Establishment of a digital PCR method for detection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato complex DNA in cerebrospinal fluid.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Direct Capture and Early Detection of Lyme Disease Spirochete in Skin with a Microneedle Patch.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Capture Sequencing Enables Sensitive Detection of Tick-Borne Agents in Human Blood.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Tick-borne zoonoses and commonly used diagnostic methods in human and veterinary medicine.Parasitology research · 2021Review
- Development of a capture sequencing assay for enhanced detection and genotyping of tick-borne pathogens.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Quantitative multiplexed strategies for human Lyme disease serological testing.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2021Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lyme disease patients would greatly benefit from a timely, sensitive, and specific molecular diagnostic test that can detect the causal agent Borrelia burgdorferi at the onset of symptoms. Currently available diagnostic methods recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for Lyme disease involve indirect serological tests that rely on the detection of a host-antibody response, which often takes more than three weeks to develop. With this process, many positive cases are not detected within a timely manner, preventing a complete cure. In this study, we have developed a digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay that detects Lyme disease on clinical presentation with a sensitivity two-fold higher than that of the currently available diagnostic methods, using a cohort of patient samples collected from the Lyme disease endemic state of Connecticut, USA, in 2016-2018. Digital PCR technology was chosen as it is more advanced and sensitive than other PCR techniques in detecting rare targets. The analytical detection sensitivity of this diagnostic assay is approximately three genome copies of B. burgdorferi. The paucity of spirochetes in the bloodstream of Lyme disease patients has hindered the clinical adoption of PCR-based diagnostic tests. However, this drawback was overcome by using a comparatively larger sample volume, applying pre-analytical processing to the blood samples, and implementing a pre-amplification step to enrich for B. burgdorferi-specific gene targets before the patient samples are analyzed via digital PCR technology. Pre-analytical processing of blood samples from acute patients revealed that the best sample type for Lyme disease detection is platelet-rich plasma rather than whole blood. If detected in a timely manner, Lyme disease can be completely cured, thus limiting antibiotic overuse and associated morbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.