ArticlePLoS computational biology2020
Pre-existing resistance in the latent reservoir can compromise VRC01 therapy during chronic HIV-1 infection.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modeling quantifies in vivo neutralization, Fc-mediated killing, and resistance in human clinical trials of five anti-HIV broadly neutralizing antibodies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Pathogen virulence genes: Advances, challenges and future directions in infectious disease research (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025Review
- VRC01 Selects Rare HIV Escape Mutations After Acquisition in Antibody-Mediated Prevention Trials.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Distinct modes of evolution drive HIV escape from two broadly neutralizing antibodies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- SIV proviruses seeded later in infection are harbored in short-lived CD4Cell reports · 2025Article
- Trade-off between the antiviral and vaccinal effects of antibody therapy in the humoral response to HIV.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024Article
- Article
- Modelling HIV-1 control and remission.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Review
- Modeling resistance to the broadly neutralizing antibody PGT121 in people living with HIV-1.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- High monoclonal neutralization titers reduced breakthrough HIV-1 viral loads in the Antibody Mediated Prevention trials.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Broadly neutralizing antibodies targeting HIV: Progress and challenges.Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.) · 2023Review
- Estimating the contribution of CD4 T cell subset proliferation and differentiation to HIV persistence.Nature communications · 2023Article
- The risk of drug resistance during long-acting antimicrobial therapy.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Design of an optimal combination therapy with broadly neutralizing antibodies to suppress HIV-1.eLife · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Passive immunization with broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) of HIV-1 appears a promising strategy for eliciting long-term HIV-1 remission. When administered concomitantly with the cessation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) to patients with established viremic control, bNAb therapy is expected to prolong remission. Surprisingly, in clinical trials on chronic HIV-1 patients, the bNAb VRC01 failed to prolong remission substantially. Identifying the cause of this failure is important for improving VRC01-based therapies and unraveling potential vulnerabilities of other bNAbs. In the trials, viremia resurged rapidly in most patients despite suppressive VRC01 concentrations in circulation, suggesting that VRC01 resistance was the likely cause of failure. ART swiftly halts viral replication, precluding the development of resistance during ART. If resistance were to emerge post ART, virological breakthrough would have taken longer than without VRC01 therapy. We hypothesized therefore that VRC01-resistant strains must have been formed before ART initiation, survived ART in latently infected cells, and been activated during VRC01 therapy, causing treatment failure. Current assays preclude testing this hypothesis experimentally. We developed a mathematical model based on the hypothesis and challenged it with available clinical data. The model integrated within-host HIV-1 evolution, stochastic latency reactivation, and viral dynamics with multiple-dose VRC01 pharmacokinetics. The model predicted that single but not higher VRC01-resistant mutants would pre-exist in the latent reservoir. We constructed a virtual patient population that parsimoniously recapitulated inter-patient variations. Model predictions with this population quantitatively captured data of VRC01 failure from clinical trials, presenting strong evidence supporting the hypothesis. We attributed VRC01 failure to single-mutant VRC01-resistant proviruses in the latent reservoir triggering viral recrudescence, particularly when VRC01 was at trough levels. Pre-existing resistant proviruses in the latent reservoir may similarly compromise other bNAbs. Our study provides a framework for designing bNAb-based therapeutic protocols that would avert such failure and maximize HIV-1 remission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.