Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33252950›Full record

ArticleThe American psychologist2020

Aligning dissemination and implementation science with health policies to improve children's mental health.

Kimberly Eaton Hoagwood, Jonathan Purtle, Julia Spandorfer, Robin Peth-Pierce, Sarah McCue Horwitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American psychologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Implementation of the framework for disability and rehabilitation in Gauteng, South Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Enhancing Impact: A Call to Action for Equitable Implementation Science.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kimberly Eaton HoagwoodDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University Langone Health.ORCID 0000-0002-9920-9896
Jonathan PurtleDepartment of Health Management and Policy, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University.
Julia SpandorferDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University Langone Health.ORCID 0000-0001-5682-5456
Robin Peth-PiercePublic Health Communications Consulting, LLC.ORCID 0000-0002-9695-505X
Sarah McCue HorwitzDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University Langone Health.ORCID 0000-0002-5262-1170

Funding

National Survey of State Policy Decision-making and SimulationP50MH113662 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HOAGWOOD, KIMBERLY E., MCKAY, MARY MCKERNAN · 2019 to 2022
$6.9M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH113662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of mental health problems among children (ages 0-21) in the United States remains unacceptably high and, post-COVID-19, is expected to increase dramatically. Decades of psychological knowledge about effective treatments should inform the delivery of better services. Dissemination and implementation (D&I) science has been heralded as a solution to the persistent problem of poor quality services and has, to some extent, improved our understanding of the contexts of delivery systems that implement effective practices. However, there are few studies demonstrating clear, population-level impacts of psychological interventions on children. Momentum is growing among communities, cities, states, and some federal agencies to build "health in all policies" to address broad familial, social, and economic factors known to affect children's healthy development and mental health. These health policy initiatives offer a rare opportunity to repurpose D&I science, shifting it from a primary focus on evidence-based practice implementation, to a focus on policy development and implementation to support child and family health and well-being. This shift is critical as states develop policy responses to address the health and mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on already-vulnerable families. We provide a typology for building research on D&I and children's mental health policy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Implementation ScienceAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolEvidence-Based PracticeHealth PolicyHumansInfantInformation DisseminationMental HealthMental Health ServicesUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33252950
PMCPMC8034490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.