Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33252944›Full record

ArticleThe American psychologist2020

Toward the data-driven dissemination of findings from psychological science.

Jonathan Purtle, Jacob S Marzalik, Raquel W Halfond, Lynn F Bufka, Bethany A Teachman, Gregory A Aarons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American psychologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Conference Proceedings for theTrauma surgery & acute care open · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Is aspirin enough for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis?Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonathan PurtleDepartment of Health Management and Policy, Drexel University.
Jacob S MarzalikAmerican Psychological Association.ORCID 0000-0001-7716-4271
Raquel W HalfondAmerican Psychological Association.
Lynn F BufkaAmerican Psychological Association.
Bethany A TeachmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia.
Gregory A AaronsDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego.ORCID 0000-0001-8969-5002

Funding

National Survey of State Policy Decision-making and SimulationP50MH113662 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HOAGWOOD, KIMBERLY E., MCKAY, MARY MCKERNAN · 2019 to 2022
$6.9M
NIDA NIH HHSNIMH NIH HHS P50 MH113662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The public health impact of psychological science is maximized when it is disseminated clearly and compellingly to audiences who can act on it. Dissemination research can generate knowledge to help achieve this, but dissemination is understudied in the field of implementation science. As a consequence, the designs of dissemination strategies are typically driven by anecdote, not evidence, and are often ineffective. We address this issue by synthesizing key theory and findings from consumer psychology and detailing a novel research approach for "data-driven dissemination." The approach has 3 parts: (a) formative audience research, which characterizes an audience's awareness about, adoption of, and attitudes toward an intervention, as well as preferences for receiving information about it; (b) audience segmentation research, which identifies meaningful subgroups within an audience to inform the tailoring of dissemination strategies; and (c) dissemination effectiveness research, which determines the strategies that are most effective. This approach is then illustrated using the dissemination of the American Psychological Association's (APA, 2017) Clinical Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in Adults as a case study. Data are presented from a 2018-2019 survey of licensed APA-member psychologists who treat adults with PTSD (n = 407, response rate = 29.8%). We present survey findings on awareness about, attitudes toward, and adoption of the guideline and find significant differences across these domains between psychologists who do and do not regularly use clinical practice guidelines. We conclude by discussing future directions to advance dissemination research and practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Health Care SurveysInformation DisseminationPractice Guidelines as TopicPsychologyAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedStress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

Identifiers

PMID33252944
PMCPMC8182894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.