ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2021
[Impact of a more stringent organization of intravitreal injection treatment on the number of treatments and examinations in routine practice].
Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResults from recent studies show that less intravitreal injections are often performed in everyday practice than in controlled trials, which subsequently leads to worse treatment success. In this study we analyzed the introduction of a more stringent organization of treatment using workflow optimization and new IT systems and analyzed the effect on treatment continuity. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn the second quarter of 2019 a new medical practice management software and a software for automated injection planning were implemented. There was also a change of the treatment regimen from pro re nata (PRN) to treat and extend (T&E ). We analyzed the results of the patients regarding the frequency of injections and treatment controls three quarters before (Q3/2018-Q1/2019) and three quarters after the change (Q2/2019-Q4/2019). Treatment-naive and pretreated patients were analyzed.
resultsIn group 1 (Q3/2018-Q1/2019) the average number of injections per quarter was 1.74 (SD = 0.4). Eyes of patients from group 2 (Q2/2019-Q4/2019) received on average 2.17 (SD = 0.3) injections. The number of check-ups per quarter was 1.71 (SD = 0.3) before the introduction, and thereafter 2.16 (SD = 0.3). There was a significant increase in the number of OCTs from 1.18 (SD = 0.2) to 1.98 (SD = 0.3). The visual acuity was stable in both groups.
conclusionWe were able to show that the introduction of the medical practice management software and the change of the regimen from PRN to T&E can achieve numbers of injections, check-ups and OCT similar to those in studies. A standardized procedure facilitates efficient treatment planning and enables a better patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33252769What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.