ReviewPediatric radiology2020
The impact of our images: psychological implications in expectant parents after a prenatal diagnosis.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mothers' Experiences From Prenatal Diagnosis to Home Following Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: A Qualitative Study.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Perinatal Mood and Anxiety in Women Undergoing Open Maternal-Fetal Surgery for Myelomeningocele Closure.Fetal diagnosis and therapy · 2026Article
- Parental Perspectives on Prenatal Counseling and Communication at the Time of Initial Evaluation and Diagnosis of Congenital Heart Disease.American journal of perinatology · 2026Article
- Parental Hopes and Understandings of the Value of Prenatal Diagnostic Genomic Sequencing: A Qualitative Analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Maternal Mental Health following Ultrasonographic Detection of Fetal Structural Anomaly in the Midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parents are at heightened risk for perinatal depression, anxiety and traumatic stress after receiving a prenatal diagnosis of a congenital anomaly. Identifying patients at risk and implementing effective support is crucial to optimizing care in this vulnerable population. A multidisciplinary care team with embedded psychosocial support services can be utilized to evaluate and address the needs of pregnant women and their families, not only at the time of diagnosis, but throughout the course of the pregnancy and postpartum period. Provider awareness helps to facilitate expedited referral to psychosocial services to provide comprehensive care to the patient and family unit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.