ReviewSub-cellular biochemistry2021
Interaction Networks of Ribosomal Expansion Segments in Kinetoplastids.
Review in Sub-cellular biochemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A rapid, simple, and economical method for the isolation of ribosomes and translational machinery for structural and functional studies.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Ribosome Structural Changes Dynamically Affect Ribosome Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Expansion segments (ES) are insertions of a few to hundreds of nucleotides at discrete locations on eukaryotic ribosomal RNA (rRNA) chains. Some cluster around 'hot spots' involved in translation regulation and some may participate in biogenesis. Whether ES play the same roles in different organisms is currently unclear, especially since their size may vary dramatically from one species to another and very little is known about their functions. Most likely, ES variation is linked to adaptation to a particular environment. In this chapter, we compare the interaction networks of ES from four kinetoplastid parasites, which have evolved in diverse insect vectors and mammalian hosts: Trypanosoma cruzi, Trypanosoma brucei, Leishmania donovani and Leishmania major. Here, we comparatively analyze ribosome structures from these representative kinetoplastids and ascertain meaningful structural differences from mammalian ribosomes. We base our analysis on sequence alignments and three-dimensional structures of 80S ribosomes solved by cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM). Striking differences in size are observed between ribosomes of different parasites, indicating that not all ES are expanded equally. Larger ES are not always matched by large surrounding ES or proteins extensions in their vicinity, a particularity that may lead to clues about their biological function. ES display different species-specific patterns of conservation, which underscore the density of their interaction network at the surface of the ribosome. Making sense of the conservation patterns of ES is part of a global effort to lay the basis for functional studies aimed at discovering unique kinetoplastid-specific sites suitable for therapeutic applications against these human and often animal pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.