ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2021
Uncovering patterns of the evolution of genomic sequence entropy and complexity.
Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Bioinformatics tools for the sequence complexity estimates.Biophysical reviews · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The lack of consensus concerning the biological meaning of entropy and complexity of genomes and the different ways to assess these data hamper conclusions concerning what are the causes of genomic entropy variation among species. This study aims to evaluate the entropy and complexity of genomic sequences of several species without using homologies to assess relationships among these variables and non-molecular data (e.g., the number of individuals) to seek a trigger of interspecific genomic entropy variation. The results indicate a relationship among genomic entropy, genome size, genomic complexity, and the number of individuals: species with a small number of individuals harbors large genome, and hence, low entropy but a higher complexity. We defined that the complexity of a genome relies on the entropy of each DNA segment within genome. Then, the entropy and complexity of a genome reflects its organization solely. Exons of vertebrates harbor smaller entropies than non-exon regions (likely by the repeats that accumulated from duplications), whereas other taxonomic groups do not present this pattern. Our findings suggest that small initial population might have defined current genomic entropy and complexity: actual genomes are less complex than ancestral ones. Besides, our data disagree with the relationship between phenotype and genomic entropies previously established. Finally, by establishing the relationship between genomic entropy/complexity with the number of individuals and genome size, under an evolutive perspective, ideas concerning the genomic variability may emerge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.