Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33252617›Full record

ArticleJAMA neurology2021

Trends in Relative Incidence and Prevalence of Dementia Across Non-Hispanic Black and White Individuals in the United States, 2000-2016.

Melinda C Power, Erin E Bennett, Robert W Turner, N Maritza Dowling, Adam Ciarleglio, M Maria Glymour, Kan Z Gianattasio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Diabetes, hyperglycemia, and ATN blood biomarkers in Hispanic/Latino populations: SOL-INCA study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Successful strategies for supporting diverse representation in Alzheimer's disease research.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evolution of shared care networks by race and ethnicity: findings from the National Health and Aging Trends Study.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Melinda C PowerDepartment of Epidemiology, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Erin E BennettDepartment of Epidemiology, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Robert W TurnerDepartment of Clinical Research and Leadership, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
N Maritza DowlingDepartment of Acute and Chronic Care, School of Nursing, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Adam CiarleglioDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
M Maria GlymourDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
Kan Z GianattasioDepartment of Epidemiology, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC.

Funding

Race/ethnic disparities and the incidence and over- or under-diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and related dementia in the United StatesR03AG055485 · NIA · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI POWER, MELINDA C · 2017 to 2018
$160k
NIA NIH HHS R03 AG055485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: In the US, dementia risk is higher in non-Hispanic Black individuals than in non-Hispanic White individuals. To evaluate progress toward reducing such disparities, tracking secular trends in racial disparities in dementia prevalence is essential. Objective: To examine whether relative racial disparities in dementia prevalence or incidence have changed in the US from 2000 to 2016. Design, Settings, and Participants: The Health and Retirement Study (HRS) is a nationally representative study of adults 50 years or older. New participants are recruited every 6 years, and study visits occur biennially. Approximately 17 000 to 22 000 respondents have been surveyed at each wave since 2000, achieving response rates of 81% to 89%. Data for this cohort study were obtained from non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black participants aged 70 years and older from the 2000 to 2016 waves. For analyses of secular trends in racial disparities in dementia prevalence, each HRS wave was considered separately (range of participants meeting eligibility criteria in each wave, 6322-7579). For analyses of secular trends in racial disparities in dementia incidence, 7 subcohorts were created (range of participants meeting eligibility criteria in each subcohort, 5322-5961) following up people without dementia for 4 years from subcohort baseline visits in 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2010, and 2012. Data were analyzed from October 2019 to August 2020. Exposures: Race based on self-response to closed-ended survey questions. Main Outcomes and Measures: Dementia status was determined using 3 algorithms with similar sensitivity and specificity across non-Hispanic White and Black participants. Disparities were characterized using ratio measures. Results: In this study, the mean age and percentage of male participants eligible for inclusion in analyses of racial disparities in dementia prevalence increased over time among non-Hispanic White participants (from 78.2 years and 40% in 2000 to 78.7 years and 44% in 2016) but remained steady in non-Hispanic Black participants during the same period (from 78.0 years and 37% in 2000 to 77.9 years and 38% in 2016). Prevalence ratios comparing Black and White participants ranged from approximately 1.5 to 1.9 across algorithms and years, whereas hazard ratios ranged from approximately 1.4 to 1.8. Although results suggest stable or declining dementia risk overall, there was no evidence suggesting change in relative racial disparities in dementia prevalence or incidence during follow-up. Conclusions and Relevance: This study did not find evidence to suggest that the ratio of dementia risk across Black and White individuals changed in the US between 2000 and 2016. Additional efforts to identify and mitigate the source of these disparities is warranted.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsBlack or African AmericanCross-Sectional StudiesDementiaFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesMalePrevalenceUnited StatesWhite People

Identifiers

PMID33252617
PMCPMC7953306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.