Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33252345›Full record

ReviewJMIR public health and surveillance2020

Social Media as a Research Tool (SMaaRT) for Risky Behavior Analytics: Methodological Review.

Tavleen Singh, Kirk Roberts, Trevor Cohen, Nathan Cobb, Jing Wang, Kayo Fujimoto, Sahiti Myneni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Potential of artificial intelligence in injury prevention research and practice.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2024
    Article
  10. Investigating Substance Use via Reddit: Systematic Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tavleen SinghSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1721-4780
Kirk RobertsSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6525-5213
Trevor CohenBiomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0159-6697
Nathan CobbGeorgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4210-226X
Jing WangSchool of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4012-0977
Kayo FujimotoSchool of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8445-2711
Sahiti MyneniSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9211-1626

Funding

Pragmatics to Reveal Intention in Social Media (PRISM) for Health PromotionR01LM012974 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MYNENI, SAHITI · 2019 to 2022
$1.5M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModifiable risky health behaviors, such as tobacco use, excessive alcohol use, being overweight, lack of physical activity, and unhealthy eating habits, are some of the major factors for developing chronic health conditions. Social media platforms have become indispensable means of communication in the digital era. They provide an opportunity for individuals to express themselves, as well as share their health-related concerns with peers and health care providers, with respect to risky behaviors. Such peer interactions can be utilized as valuable data sources to better understand inter-and intrapersonal psychosocial mediators and the mechanisms of social influence that drive behavior change.

objectiveThe objective of this review is to summarize computational and quantitative techniques facilitating the analysis of data generated through peer interactions pertaining to risky health behaviors on social media platforms.

methodsWe performed a systematic review of the literature in September 2020 by searching three databases-PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus-using relevant keywords, such as "social media," "online health communities," "machine learning," "data mining," etc. The reporting of the studies was directed by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Two reviewers independently assessed the eligibility of studies based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. We extracted the required information from the selected studies.

resultsThe initial search returned a total of 1554 studies, and after careful analysis of titles, abstracts, and full texts, a total of 64 studies were included in this review. We extracted the following key characteristics from all of the studies: social media platform used for conducting the study, risky health behavior studied, the number of posts analyzed, study focus, key methodological functions and tools used for data analysis, evaluation metrics used, and summary of the key findings. The most commonly used social media platform was Twitter, followed by Facebook, QuitNet, and Reddit. The most commonly studied risky health behavior was nicotine use, followed by drug or substance abuse and alcohol use. Various supervised and unsupervised machine learning approaches were used for analyzing textual data generated from online peer interactions. Few studies utilized deep learning methods for analyzing textual data as well as image or video data. Social network analysis was also performed, as reported in some studies.

conclusionsOur review consolidates the methodological underpinnings for analyzing risky health behaviors and has enhanced our understanding of how social media can be leveraged for nuanced behavioral modeling and representation. The knowledge gained from our review can serve as a foundational component for the development of persuasive health communication and effective behavior modification technologies aimed at the individual and population levels.

Indexed as

Data AnalysisRisk-TakingData ManagementHumansResearch DesignSocial Mediadata mininginfodemiologyinfoveillancemachine learningnatural language processingonline health communitiesrisky health behaviorssocial mediatext mining

Identifiers

PMID33252345
PMCPMC7735906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.