Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33252283›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2020

Laser-Assisted Removal of Embedded Vena Cava Filters: A First-In-Human Escalation Trial in 500 Patients Refractory to High-Force Retrieval.

William T Kuo, Ankur A Doshi, John M Ponting, Jarrett K Rosenberg, Tie Liang, Lawrence V Hofmann

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval: Simple to Complex.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2024
    Review
  6. The development of a novel endovascular grasper for challenging inferior vena cava filter retrieval.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

William T KuoDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA.
Ankur A DoshiDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA.
John M PontingDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA.
Jarrett K RosenbergDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA.
Tie LiangDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA.
Lawrence V HofmannDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Many patients are subject to potential risks and filter-related morbidity when standard retrieval methods fail. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the laser sheath technique for removing embedded inferior vena cava filters. Methods and Results Over an 8.5-year period, 500 patients were prospectively enrolled in an institutional review board-approved study. There were 225 men and 275 women (mean age, 49 years; range, 15-90 years). Indications for retrieval included symptomatic acute inferior vena cava thrombosis, chronic inferior vena cava occlusion, and/or pain from filter penetration. Retrieval was also offered to prevent risks from prolonged implantation and potentially to eliminate need for lifelong anticoagulation. After retrieval failed using 3X standard retrieval force (6-7 lb via digital gauge), treatment escalation was attempted using laser sheath powered by 308-nm XeCl excimer laser system (CVX-300; Spectranetics). We hypothesized that the laser-assisted technique would allow retrieval of >95% of embedded filters with <5% risk of major complications and with lower force. Primary outcome was successful retrieval. Primary safety outcome was any major procedure-related complication. Laser-assisted retrieval was successful in 99.4% of cases (497/500) (95% CI, 98.3%-99.9%) and significantly >95% (

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsDevice RemovalEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansLasers, ExcimerMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSafetyTreatment OutcomeAnticoagulantsendovascularfilter retrievalIVC filterlaser

Identifiers

PMID33252283
PMCPMC7955387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.