Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33252180›Full record

ArticleCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2021

In Situ Classification of Cell Types in Human Kidney Tissue Using 3D Nuclear Staining.

Andre Woloshuk, Suraj Khochare, Aljohara F Almulhim, Andrew T McNutt, Dawson Dean, Daria Barwinska, Michael J Ferkowicz, Michael T Eadon, Katherine J Kelly, Kenneth W Dunn and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andre WoloshukDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Suraj KhochareDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Aljohara F AlmulhimDepartment of Computer Science, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Andrew T McNuttDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Dawson DeanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Daria BarwinskaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Michael J FerkowiczDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Michael T EadonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Katherine J KellyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Kenneth W DunnDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Mohammad A HasanDepartment of Computer Science, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Tarek M El-AchkarDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Seth WinfreeDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of MedicineUniversity of Indianapolis · US

Funding

PROBE DELIVERY COREP30DK079312 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI DAGHER, PIERRE C · 2007 to 2021
$17.1M
Proximal Tubule Albumin Transport in Disease States.R01DK091623 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOLITORIS, BRUCE A · 2011 to 2021
$4.3M
Short-Term Training Program In Biomedical SciencesT35HL110854 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Brittney-Shea Herbert, Catherine Rufatto Sears · 2012 to 2026
$3.4M
Acute inhibition of renal gene expression to prevent nephrotoxicity.K08DK107864 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI EADON, MICHAEL THOMAS · 2016 to 2020
$772k
NHLBI NIH HHS T35 HL110854NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK107864NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079312NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK091623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand the physiology and pathology of disease, capturing the heterogeneity of cell types within their tissue environment is fundamental. In such an endeavor, the human kidney presents a formidable challenge because its complex organizational structure is tightly linked to key physiological functions. Advances in imaging-based cell classification may be limited by the need to incorporate specific markers that can link classification to function. Multiplex imaging can mitigate these limitations, but requires cumulative incorporation of markers, which may lead to tissue exhaustion. Furthermore, the application of such strategies in large scale 3-dimensional (3D) imaging is challenging. Here, we propose that 3D nuclear signatures from a DNA stain, DAPI, which could be incorporated in most experimental imaging, can be used for classifying cells in intact human kidney tissue. We developed an unsupervised approach that uses 3D tissue cytometry to generate a large training dataset of nuclei images (NephNuc), where each nucleus is associated with a cell type label. We then devised various supervised machine learning approaches for kidney cell classification and demonstrated that a deep learning approach outperforms classical machine learning or shape-based classifiers. Specifically, a custom 3D convolutional neural network (NephNet3D) trained on nuclei image volumes achieved a balanced accuracy of 80.26%. Importantly, integrating NephNet3D classification with tissue cytometry allowed in situ visualization of cell type classifications in kidney tissue. In conclusion, we present a tissue cytometry and deep learning approach for in situ classification of cell types in human kidney tissue using only a DNA stain. This methodology is generalizable to other tissues and has potential advantages on tissue economy and non-exhaustive classification of different cell types.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerHumansKidneyStaining and LabelingSupervised Machine Learningdeep learninghuman kidneyin situ classificationtissue cytometry

Identifiers

PMID33252180
PMCPMC8382162
OpenAlexW3109598412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.