Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33252116›Full record

ArticleBiomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia2022

Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with cabozantinib in the Czech Republic: analysis of four cancer centers.

Igor Richter, Alexandr Poprach, Anezka Zemankova, Tomas Buchler, Jiri Bartos, Vladimir Samal, Hana Studentova, Aneta Rozsypalova, Josef Dvorak, Ondrej Brom and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Igor RichterDepartment of Oncology, Regional Hospital Liberec, Czech Republic.
Alexandr PoprachDepartment of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Anezka ZemankovaDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Tomas BuchlerDepartment of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jiri BartosDepartment of Oncology, Regional Hospital Liberec, Czech Republic.
Vladimir SamalDepartment of Urology, Regional Hospital Liberec, Czech Republic.
Hana StudentovaDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Aneta RozsypalovaDepartment of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Josef DvorakDepartment of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Ondrej BromACREA, Czech Republic.
Bohuslav MelicharDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZKrajská Nemocnice Liberec · CZPalacký University Olomouc · CZAcrea (Czechia) · CZMasaryk Memorial Cancer Institute · CZThomayer University Hospital · CZUniversity Hospital Olomouc · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze treatment outcomes and tolerance in patients in whom cabozantinib was used after previous targeted therapy. PATIENTS AND

methodsCabozantinib was administered in dose 60 mg/day, a subset of patients received initial dose of 40 mg/day. The treatment was administered until to progression or unacceptable toxicity. CT scans were assessed according to the RECIST 1.1 and toxicity of treatment was assessed based on the CTCAE (version 4). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We performed a multivariate analysis of risk factors for treatment outcomes (PFS, OS) by Cox regression analysis. All statistics were evaluated at the significance level alpha = 0.05.

results54 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) were evaluated. Median PFS in all patients treated with cabozantinib was 9.3 months (95% CI 5.3 - 13.3). One-year survival was 85.2% (95% CI 72.9 - 93.4%). Treatment response was observed in 45.9% of cases, including one complete remission. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that presence of subsequent treatment was the only factor with a significant effect on OS (P=0.008). Adverse events occurred in 88.9% of patients, grade 3 - 4 in 46.3%.

conclusionThe analysis of our cohort of patients treated with cabozantinib in the second or higher lines of treatment showed that cabozantinib represents an effective and safe therapy and contributes to longer survival of our mRCC patients.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsAnilidesCzech RepublicHumansPyridinesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnilidescabozantinibPyridinescabozantinibmetastasesrenal cell carcinomatoxicity

Identifiers

PMID33252116
OpenAlexW3109251115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.