Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33252093›Full record

ReviewJournal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine

Bowel function and care: Guidelines for the care of people with spina bifida.

Patricia Beierwaltes, Paige Church, Tiffany Gordon, Lusine Ambartsumyan

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of spina bifida].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Patricia BeierwaltesMinnesota State University Mankato, Mankato, MN, USA.
Paige ChurchThe Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Tiffany GordonWorkforce Professional Development and Family Nurse Practitioner Clinical Experiences, Minnesota State University Mankato, Mankato, MN, USA.
Lusine AmbartsumyanUniversity of Washington, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA.
Minnesota State University, Mankato · USHospital for Sick Children · CAUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Comp A-Developing the Spina Bifida Collaborative Care NetworkU01DD001077 · DD · SPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION · PI THIBADEAU, JUDY KAREN · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
ACL HHS U01DD001077NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBowel dysfunction, such as constipation and fecal incontinence, has a significant impact on health, activities of daily living, and quality of life among people with spina bifida. Secondary complications may result from bowel dysfunction and include urologic dysfunction, loss of skin integrity, shunt (hydrocephalus) function, as well as loss of social opportunities and employability.

methodsUsing a consensus building methodology, the guidelines for management of bowel dysfunction in spina bifida were written by experts in the field of spina bifida and bowel function and care.

resultsThe evidence-based guidelines are presented in table format and provide age-specific recommendations to achieve fecal continence without constipation. Recommended treatments are presented from least to most invasive options. Literature supporting the recommendations and the interval research published to date is also presented.

conclusionThese guidelines present a standardized approach to management of bowel dysfunction in spina bifida. Bowel management in children and young adults with spina bifida is limited by variability in clinical practice and paucity of robust research in neurogenic bowel. Collaborative multi-institutional efforts are needed to overcome research barriers and provide innovative solutions.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntestinal DiseasesMalePractice Guidelines as TopicSpinal DysraphismYoung Adultbowel managementconstipationfecal incontinenceneural tube defectsneurogenic bowelneurogenic bowel dysfunctionSpina bifida

Identifiers

PMID33252093
PMCPMC7838963
OpenAlexW3109438065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.