Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33251849›Full record

ArticleThe Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology2021

Comparison of Patient Satisfaction Between Virtual Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic and In-person Visits Pre-pandemic.

Kyohei Itamura, Dennis M Tang, Thomas S Higgins, Franklin L Rimell, Elisa A Illing, Jonathan Y Ting, Matthew K Lee, Arthur Wu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Patient Satisfaction with Virtual vs In-Person Voice Therapy.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2024
    Article
  7. Transition to Virtual Asthma Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Observational Study.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2022
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. The Research on Patient Satisfaction with Remote Healthcare Prior to and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kyohei ItamuraDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Dennis M TangDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Thomas S HigginsDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Louisville University, Louisville, KY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2020-6386
Franklin L RimellDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Elisa A IllingDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Jonathan Y TingDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Matthew K LeeDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2842-7191
Arthur WuDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8993-6355

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the patient experience of a virtual otolaryngology clinic visit to an in-person visit, especially with its significantly increased implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsPatient satisfaction (PS) metrics from the Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey were queried from March 1, 2020 to May 1, 2020 for telehealth visits and January 1, 2020 to March 1, 2020 for in-person visits. Overlapping and comparable questions were analyzed using Mann-Whitney

resultsThere were 1284 partial or complete PS surveys from in-person visits and 221 partial or complete virtual PS surveys. There were statistically significantly worse virtual visit evaluations of provider listening, conveyance of information, likelihood to recommend, and overall provider ratings compared to in-person visits.

conclusionTelehealth has become the new norm for most healthcare providers in the United States. This study demonstrates some of the initial shortcomings of telehealth in an otolaryngology practice and identifies challenges with interpersonal communication that may need to be addressed as telehealth becomes increasingly prevalent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Indexed as

PandemicsPatient SatisfactionRemote ConsultationAmbulatory CareCaliforniaCommunicationCOVID-19Health Care SurveysHumansOtolaryngologyPhysician-Patient RelationsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19patient experiencepatient satisfactiontelehealthtelemedicinevirtual medicine

Identifiers

PMID33251849
PMCPMC8174012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.