ArticlePain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain2021
Sex-specific Differences in Multisite Pain Presentation among Adults with Lower-Limb Loss.
Article in Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment and characterization of back pain and biopsychosocial influences in lower limb amputation: scoping review.Pain reports · 2026Review
- Pain, Balance-Confidence, Functional Mobility, and Reach Are Associated With Risk of Recurrent Falls Among Adults With Lower-Limb Amputation.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2023Article
- Post-amputation pain: Comparing pain presentations between adults with and without increased amputated-region sensitivity.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2023Article
- Mechanical Pain Sensitivity in Postamputation Pain.The Clinical journal of pain · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesMultisite pain remains significantly understudied following lower-limb loss (LLL), especially among females. This study aimed to explore sex-specific differences in the presentation of multisite pain post LLL. Hypotheses were multisite pain would be more prevalent among females post LLL as compared with males, and female sex would be significantly associated with multisite pain prevalence.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, participants answered standardized questions regarding the presence of amputation-specific (ie, phantom-limb, residual-limb) and secondary (ie, contralateral-limb, low-back) pain. Multisite pain was defined as pain in ≥ 2 locations. Sex-specific differences in pain prevalence were evaluated using chi-square tests (P ≤ 0.050). Using logistic regression, the association between sex and multisite pain was examined after controlling for covariates (age, body mass index, time since amputation, amputation etiology and level).
resultsThe sample included 303 adults (33% females) ≥ 1 year post unilateral LLL. More females than males reported pain in the residual limb (53.0% vs. 38.4%), low back (56.0% vs. 39.9%), contralateral knee (37.0% vs. 24.1%), and contralateral hip (25.0% vs. 12.3%; P < 0.050). More females than males were classified as having multisite pain (72.0% vs. 54.7%; P = 0.004). While patterns of multisite pain were similar (ie, pain affected both amputation-specific and secondary sites) between sexes, being female was independently associated with higher odds of having multisite pain (odds ratio: 2.40, 95% confidence interval: 1.40 to 4.12). DISCUSSION: Female sex appears to be associated with multisite pain ≥ 1 year after LLL. Future work is needed to identify mechanisms underlying sex-specific differences in pain presentation and evaluate the impact of sex on pain-related outcomes post amputation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.