ArticleActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2021
Circadian variation in sudden unexpected infant death in the United States.
Article in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Global, regional, and national characteristics and incidence of sudden death from 1948 to 2022: a systematic review and modelling study.Journal of global health · 2026Pooled it
- The risk of sleep-related death in an inclined sleep environment.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Understanding three approaches to reporting sudden unexpected infant death in the USA.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2024Article
- Common Ground between Biological Rhythms and Forensics.Biology · 2022Review
- Circadian variation in sudden unexpected infant death in the United States.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo determine which factors are associated with sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) by time of day.
methodsData were analysed from the National Fatality Review Case Reporting System (2006-2015). Out of 20 005 SUID deaths in 37 states, 12 191 (60.9%) deaths had a recorded nearest hour of discovery of the infant. We compared distribution patterns between time of death and 118 variables to determine which were significantly correlated with SUID time of death using advanced statistical modelling techniques.
resultsThe 12-hour time periods that were most different were 10:00 to 21:00 (daytime) and 22:00 to 09:00 (nighttime). The main features that were associated with nighttime SUID were bed sharing, younger infants, non-white infants, placed supine to sleep and found supine, and caregiver was the parent. Daytime SUID was associated with older infants, day care, white infants, sleeping in an adult bed and prone sleep position. Factors not associated with time of death were sex of the infant, smoking and breastfeeding.
conclusionSudden unexpected infant death deaths that occur at night are associated with a separate set of risk factors compared to deaths that occur during the day. However, to minimise risk, it is important to practice safe sleep guidelines during both nighttime and daytime sleep.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.