Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33251432›Full record

ArticleACS omega2020

Dissolution Kinetics of Different Inorganic Oilfield Scales in Green Formulations.

Musa Ahmed, Ibnelwaleed A Hussein, Abdulmujeeb T Onawole, Mohammed A Saad, Mohamed Mahmoud

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Musa AhmedGas Processing Center, College of Engineering, P.O. Box 2713, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.
Ibnelwaleed A HusseinGas Processing Center, College of Engineering, P.O. Box 2713, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.
Abdulmujeeb T OnawoleGas Processing Center, College of Engineering, P.O. Box 2713, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.
Mohammed A SaadChemical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, P.O. Box 2713, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.
Mohamed MahmoudPetroleum Engineering Department, KFUPM, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.
Qatar University · QAKing Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scale mineral deposition is a critical problem that hinders the daily production of oil and gas fields. Chemical removal of these scales, based on the scale type, is common. In this paper, borax and diethylene tremaine penta acetic (DTPA) acid-based formulations are used for the removal of sulfides, carbonates, and sulfate scales. In particular, the dissolution rates of sulfide (pyrite, pyrrhotite, and galena), sulfate (celestite and barite), and carbonate (calcite) scales were investigated in a rotating disc apparatus at typical well conditions. Scanning electron microscopy-energy-dispersive X-ray and X-ray diffraction analyses were performed for characterizing scale composition and type. The effect of temperature, scale type, and formulation on the dissolution rate is studied. Even though borax formulation has been developed for the sulfide scale removal, it showed a high dissolution rate for the carbonate scale (7.23 × 10

Identifiers

PMID33251432
PMCPMC7689925
OpenAlexW3106430223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.