ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020
Toward Biomimetic Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: 3D Printing Techniques in Regenerative Medicine.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemical Post-Processing of SLM Ti6Al4V Structures Using HF with Propylene Glycol: Surface, Structural and Biological Evaluation of an Exploratory Post-Processing Strategy.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advances in Decellularization of Fish Wastes for Extracellular Matrix Extraction in Sustainable Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Pediatric physeal repair: from immune-angiogenic-osteogenic coupling to zonal biomimetic scaffolds.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Particle-based hydrogel inks and support matrices for biofabricating structural complexity, soluble gradients, and cell-lined channels in fully granular bioprinted systems.Biofabrication · 2025Article
- Enhancing Bone Scaffold Fabrication: A Comparative Study of Manual Casting and Automated 3D Bioprinting.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- A Review on Bioengineering the Bovine Mammary Gland: The Role of the Extracellular Matrix and Reconstruction Prospects.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Highly Elastic, Biodegradable Polyester-Based Citrate Rubber for 3D Printing in Regenerative Engineering.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
- Bone Regeneration: A Review of Current Treatment Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Three-Dimensional Printing/Bioprinting and Cellular Therapies for Regenerative Medicine: Current Advances.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Biomimetic multizonal scaffolds for the reconstruction of zonal articular cartilage in chondral and osteochondral defects.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Innovative 3D printing technologies and advanced materials revolutionizing orthopedic surgery: current applications and future directions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Blueprints of Architected Materials: A Guide to Metamaterial Design for Tissue Engineering.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2024Review
- Article
- Improving Thermosensitive Bioink Scaffold Fabrication with a Temperature-Regulated Printhead in Robot-AssistedACS omega · 2024Article
- Impact of Hydroxyapatite on Gelatin/Oxidized Alginate 3D-Printed Cryogel Scaffolds.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Scaffold-Mediated Drug Delivery for Enhanced Wound Healing: A Review.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2024Review
- Fused Deposition Modeling 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications: A Review.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Review
- Substrate topography affects PC12 cell differentiation through mechanotransduction mechanisms.Mechanobiology in medicine · 2024Article
- Electroactive 4D Porous Scaffold Based on Conducting Polymer as a Responsive and DynamicACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024Article
- Poly(methyl methacrylate) in Orthopedics: Strategies, Challenges, and Prospects in Bone Tissue Engineering.Polymers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology allows fabricating complex and precise structures by stacking materials layer by layer. The fabrication method has a strong potential in the regenerative medicine field to produce customizable and defect-fillable scaffolds for tissue regeneration. Plus, biocompatible materials, bioactive molecules, and cells can be printed together or separately to enhance scaffolds, which can save patients who suffer from shortage of transplantable organs. There are various 3D printing techniques that depend on the types of materials, or inks, used. Here, different types of organs (bone, cartilage, heart valve, liver, and skin) that are aided by 3D printed scaffolds and printing methods that are applied in the biomedical fields are reviewed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.