Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33251143›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020

Dual Tracers of 16α-[18F]fluoro-17β-Estradiol and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose for Prediction of Progression-Free Survival After Fulvestrant Therapy in Patients With HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Cheng Liu, Xiaoping Xu, Huiyu Yuan, Yongping Zhang, Yingjian Zhang, Shaoli Song, Zhongyi Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Role of Estrogen Receptor-Targeted PET with 16α-Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Head-to-Head comparison of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Annals of nuclear medicine · 2023
    Article
  5. Evaluation of tumour heterogeneity byBreast cancer research : BCR · 2022
    Article
  6. Head-to-Head Comparison betweenJournal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cheng LiuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoping XuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Huiyu YuanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Yongping ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Yingjian ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Shaoli SongDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Zhongyi YangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Fudan University · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to employ dual tracers 16α-[18F]fluoro-17β-estradiol (

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 35 HR+HER2- MBC patients who underwent

resultsIn total, 12 patients had both

conclusion

Indexed as

breast cancerER expressionFES/FDGfulvestrantheterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID33251143
PMCPMC7673439
OpenAlexW3097617576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.