Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33251000›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2020

Unexpected histopathology results following routine examination of cholecystectomy specimens: How big and how significant?

Abdulkarim Hasan, Khalid Nafie, Mohammed Yousef Aldossary, Amal Ismail, Khaled Monazea, Mohamad Baheeg, Kamal Rady, Reda Elhawary, Adel A Ibrahim

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Abdulkarim HasanDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Khalid NafieLaboratory & blood bank Department, Prince Mishari bin Saud Hospital, Baljurashi, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Yousef AldossaryDepartment of General Surgery, King Fahad Specialist Hospital-Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Amal IsmailDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Unaizah College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia.
Khaled MonazeaDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assiut branch, Egypt.
Mohamad BaheegDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Kamal RadyDepartment of Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Reda ElhawaryDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Adel A IbrahimDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Al-Azhar University · EGKing Fahad Specialist Hospital · SAQassim University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoutine histopathological examination (RHPE) of all gallbladder specimens is required to detect the presence of gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) or any other pathology. The work aims to study the incidence and the clinical significance of detecting unusual gallbladder findings upon the RHPE of the referred cholecystectomy specimens to a histopathology laboratory section at a referral hospital in Saudi Arabia during one year period. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom May 2019 to May 2020, all histopathology reports of 444 consecutive gallbladder specimens after elective and emergency cholecystectomies were retrospectively analyzed and divided into two groups; usual findings and unusual findings which were reviewed blindly by two other pathology consultants. Frequencies, descriptive statistics, normality test, and correlations were run. The Interrater reliability between clinical and histopathological diagnosis was assessed statistically by kappa test.

resultsThe results of histopathological examination of these gallbladder specimens showed that chronic cholecystitis was found in 296 out of 444 total cases (66.7%), acute cholecystitis in 52 cases (11.7%), and other associated usual findings in 85 cases (19%). Three cases (0.7%) of incidental carcinomas and other three cases (0.7%) of dysplasia. Eosinophilic carcinomas were detected in two cases (0.45%), gallbladder complete septum was found in one case, and one case of Phrygian cap anomaly. All patients with gallbladder carcinoma were diagnosed incidentally during the histopathological examination.

conclusionsRHPE of cholecystectomy materials are required to confirm the final diagnosis and document any other pathology. Failure to detect incidental occult carcinoma may be catastrophic, given the poor prognosis.

Indexed as

CholecystectomyCholecystitisGallbladder carcinomaHistopathological examination

Identifiers

PMID33251000
PMCPMC7677112
OpenAlexW3103858646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.