ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2020
Unexpected histopathology results following routine examination of cholecystectomy specimens: How big and how significant?
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Liquid biopsy in gallbladder carcinoma: Current evidence and future prospective.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2024Review
- Recent Technical Developments in the Field of Laparoscopic Surgery: A Literature Review.Cureus · 2022Review
- Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in Egyptian patients with morbid obesity.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
- Signet ring cell carcinoma hidden beneath large pedunculated colorectal polyp: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
- Article
- The predictive value of nasolacrimal sac biopsy in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021Article
- Clinico-pathological assessment of surgically removed abdominal wall endometriomas following cesarean section.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRoutine histopathological examination (RHPE) of all gallbladder specimens is required to detect the presence of gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) or any other pathology. The work aims to study the incidence and the clinical significance of detecting unusual gallbladder findings upon the RHPE of the referred cholecystectomy specimens to a histopathology laboratory section at a referral hospital in Saudi Arabia during one year period. MATERIALS AND
methodsFrom May 2019 to May 2020, all histopathology reports of 444 consecutive gallbladder specimens after elective and emergency cholecystectomies were retrospectively analyzed and divided into two groups; usual findings and unusual findings which were reviewed blindly by two other pathology consultants. Frequencies, descriptive statistics, normality test, and correlations were run. The Interrater reliability between clinical and histopathological diagnosis was assessed statistically by kappa test.
resultsThe results of histopathological examination of these gallbladder specimens showed that chronic cholecystitis was found in 296 out of 444 total cases (66.7%), acute cholecystitis in 52 cases (11.7%), and other associated usual findings in 85 cases (19%). Three cases (0.7%) of incidental carcinomas and other three cases (0.7%) of dysplasia. Eosinophilic carcinomas were detected in two cases (0.45%), gallbladder complete septum was found in one case, and one case of Phrygian cap anomaly. All patients with gallbladder carcinoma were diagnosed incidentally during the histopathological examination.
conclusionsRHPE of cholecystectomy materials are required to confirm the final diagnosis and document any other pathology. Failure to detect incidental occult carcinoma may be catastrophic, given the poor prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.