Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33250869›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020

Proficiency Testing of Metagenomics-Based Detection of Food-Borne Pathogens Using a Complex Artificial Sequencing Dataset.

Dirk Höper, Josephine Grützke, Annika Brinkmann, Joël Mossong, Sébastien Matamoros, Richard J Ellis, Carlus Deneke, Simon H Tausch, Isabel Cuesta, Sara Monzón and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Dirk HöperInstitute of Diagnostic Virology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.
Josephine GrützkeDepartment of Biological Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany.
Annika BrinkmannCentre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Joël MossongDépartement de Microbiologie, Laboratoire National de Santé, Dudelange, Luxembourg.
Sébastien MatamorosDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Richard J EllisAnimal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, United Kingdom.
Carlus DenekeDepartment of Biological Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany.
Simon H TauschDepartment of Biological Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany.
Isabel CuestaBioinformatics Unit, Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain.
Sara MonzónBioinformatics Unit, Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain.
Miguel JuliáBioinformatics Unit, Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain.
Thomas Nordahl PetersenResearch Group for Genomic Epidemiology, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Rene S HendriksenResearch Group for Genomic Epidemiology, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Sünje J PampResearch Group for Genomic Epidemiology, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Mikael LeijonDepartment of Microbiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.
Mikhayil HakhverdyanDepartment of Microbiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.
Aaron M WalshTeagasc Food Research Centre, APC Microbiome Ireland and Vistamilk, Moorepark, Ireland.
Paul D CotterTeagasc Food Research Centre, APC Microbiome Ireland and Vistamilk, Moorepark, Ireland.
Lakshmi ChandrasekaranNanyang Technological University Food Technology Centre (NAFTEC), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore, Singapore.
Moon Y F TayNanyang Technological University Food Technology Centre (NAFTEC), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore, Singapore.
Joergen SchlundtNanyang Technological University Food Technology Centre (NAFTEC), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore, Singapore.
Claudia SalaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Alessandra De CesareDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Andreas NitscheCentre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Martin BeerInstitute of Diagnostic Virology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.
Claudia WylezichInstitute of Diagnostic Virology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metagenomics-based high-throughput sequencing (HTS) enables comprehensive detection of all species comprised in a sample with a single assay and is becoming a standard method for outbreak investigation. However, unlike real-time PCR or serological assays, HTS datasets generated for pathogen detection do not easily provide yes/no answers. Rather, results of the taxonomic read assignment need to be assessed by trained personnel to gain information thereof. Proficiency tests are important instruments of validation, harmonization, and standardization. Within the European Union funded project COMPARE [COllaborative Management Platform for detection and Analyses of (Re-) emerging and foodborne outbreaks in Europe], we conducted a proficiency test to scrutinize the ability to assess diagnostic metagenomics data. An artificial dataset resembling shotgun sequencing of RNA from a sample of contaminated trout was provided to 12 participants with the request to provide a table with per-read taxonomic assignments at species level and a report with a summary and assessment of their findings, considering different categories like pathogen, background, or contaminations. Analysis of the read assignment tables showed that the software used reliably classified the reads taxonomically overall. However, usage of incomplete reference databases or inappropriate data pre-processing caused difficulties. From the combination of the participants' reports with their read assignments, we conclude that, although most species were detected, a number of important taxa were not or not correctly categorized. This implies that knowledge of and awareness for potentially dangerous species and contaminations need to be improved, hence, capacity building for the interpretation of diagnostic metagenomics datasets is necessary.

Indexed as

background contaminationdiagnostic assessmenthigh-throughput sequencingmetagenomicspathogenproficiency testtraining

Identifiers

PMID33250869
PMCPMC7672002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.