Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33250818›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020

Resilience Contributes to Low Emotional Impact of the COVID-19 Outbreak Among the General Population in Italy.

Vittorio Lenzo, Maria C Quattropani, Alessandro Musetti, Corrado Zenesini, Maria Francesca Freda, Daniela Lemmo, Elena Vegni, Lidia Borghi, Giuseppe Plazzi, Gianluca Castelnuovo and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Psychological Reactions during and after a Lockdown: Self-Efficacy as a Protective Factor of Mental Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Resilience and Experience of the COVID-19 Pandemic among Italian University Students: A Mixed-Method Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Vittorio LenzoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Maria C QuattropaniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Alessandro MusettiDepartment of Humanities, Social Sciences and Cultural Industries, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Corrado ZenesiniIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Maria Francesca FredaDepartment of Humanistic Studies, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Daniela LemmoDepartment of Humanistic Studies, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Elena VegniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Lidia BorghiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe PlazziDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Gianluca CastelnuovoDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Roberto CattivelliDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Emanuela SaitaDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Christian FranceschiniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
University of Milan · ITUniversity of Messina · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Parma · ITIRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITOspedale San Giuseppe · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 outbreak is severely affecting the overall mental health with unknown psychological consequences. Although a strong psychological impact is possible, scant evidence is available to date. Past studies have shown that resilience decreases the negative effects of stress. This study aimed to examine depression, anxiety, and stress among the Italian general population during the phase characterized by lockdown, and to investigate the role of resilience as a potential predictor.

methodsA total sample of 6,314 Italian people participated in this study. Participants were recruited between March 29 and May 04 2020 through an online survey. The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) and the Resilience Scale (RS) were administered. Demographic data and lockdown related information were also collected. A correlational analysis was carried out to examine relationships between psychopathological domains and resilience. Three hierarchical regression analyses were conducted using the depression, anxiety, and stress as dependent variables and the resilience as independent variable controlling for age, gender, and education. COVID-19 specific variables were also included in the three regression analyses. A further exploratory analysis was carried out to examine which aspects of resilience predict depression, anxiety, and stress.

resultsThe prevalence of moderate to extremely severe symptoms among participants was 32% for depression, 24.4% for anxiety, and 31.7% for stress. The sample mean scores on depression, anxiety, and stress were higher than the normal scores reported in the literature. Results of correlational analysis showed that resilience factors, such as meaningfulness, self-reliance, existential aloneness, and equanimity, are inversely associated with depression, anxiety, and stress. Results of regression analyses indicated that resilience was statically significant in predicting depression, anxiety, and stress. Geographic area of residence and infected acquaintances were also significant predictors. Regarding the resilience factors, results revealed that meaningfulness, perseverance, and equanimity were statistically significant in predicting all the DASS-21 scales.

conclusionAbout a third of respondents reported moderate to extremely severe depression, anxiety, and stress. The present study suggests that psychological resilience may independently contribute to low emotional distress and psychological ill-being. These findings can help explain the variability of individual responses during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Indexed as

anxietyclinical psychologyCOVID-19DASS-21depressionresilienceresilience scalestress

Identifiers

PMID33250818
PMCPMC7672208
OpenAlexW3095634118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.