Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33250770›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2020

Developmental Potential of Abnormally Fertilized Oocytes and the Associated Clinical Outcomes.

Xiao Chen, Shuai Shi, Jiating Mao, Libo Zou, Keda Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Could blastocysts derived from abnormal fertilized zygotes be used? A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Assessing the clinical viability of micro 3 pronuclei zygotes.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiao ChenReproductive Medicine Center, Jinhua People's Hospital, Jinhua, China.
Shuai ShiReproductive Medicine Center, Jinhua People's Hospital, Jinhua, China.
Jiating MaoReproductive Medicine Center, Jinhua People's Hospital, Jinhua, China.
Libo ZouReproductive Medicine Center, Jinhua People's Hospital, Jinhua, China.
Keda YuReproductive Medicine Center, Jinhua People's Hospital, Jinhua, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the embryo development potential of extending the culture of abnormally fertilized zygotes with no pronuclear (0PN), monopronuclear (1PN), and poor-quality day 3 embryos and to determine the associated clinical outcomes. This is a retrospective study performed between January 2014 and May 2018 at Jinhua People's Hospital. The normal developed embryos and the abnormal 0PN, 1PN, and poor-quality day 3 embryos were cultured to day 5 or 6 for embryo transfer. Clinical outcomes resulting from abnormal embryos and normally developed embryos were compared. A total of 6466 embryos (1542 0PN, 852 1PN, and 4072 poor-quality day 3 embryos) from 831 treatment cycles were cultured to the blastocyst stage. The total blastulation rate was 17.3% (1121/6466) with 18.2% in 0PN, 26.1% in 1PN, and 15.2% in poor-quality day 3 embryos. The rate for good-quality blastocyst formation was 9.5% (616/6466) with 11.2% in 0PN group, 14.8% in 1PN group, and 7.8% in poor-quality day 3 embryos, respectively. Blastulation rates of 0PN and 1PN derived from intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were significantly lower compared with the

Indexed as

blastocystdiscarded embryoextending culturemonopronuclearpregnant rate

Identifiers

PMID33250770
PMCPMC7672117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.