Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33250621›Full record

ArticleEthnicity & disease2020

Guidelines for Evaluating the Feasibility of Recruitment in Pilot Studies of Diverse Populations: An Overlooked but Important Component.

Anita L Stewart, Anna María Nápoles, Sorbarikor Piawah, Jasmine Santoyo-Olsson, Jeanne A Teresi

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ethnicity & disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05302310 (INSPIRE), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05302310 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

INSPIRE: Feasibility of a Community-based Integrated Care Model for Older Adults Living at Home

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of BaselRan2022 to 2022Enrolled12ConditionsFrailtyArmsintegrated care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anita L StewartCenter for Aging in Diverse Communities, Institute for Health & Aging, University of California San Francisco, CA.
Anna María NápolesDivision of Intramural Research, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Sorbarikor PiawahDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Francisco, CA.
Jasmine Santoyo-OlssonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, and School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, CA.
Jeanne A TeresiColumbia University Stroud Center at New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Alzheimer's Disease Disparities (CIRAD), New York, NY.

Funding

Residing in the Community with Dementia at the End of Life: Understanding Hospice Use and Residential SettingP30AG028741 · NIA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI ALBERT L SIU · 2010 to 2026
$21.9M
RESOURCE CENTER FOR AGING RESEARCH IN DIVERSE POPULATIONP30AG015272 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Torsten Brian Neilands · 1997 to 2026
$19.5M
Pilot CoreP30AG022845 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Manney Carrington Reid · 2003 to 2026
$15.2M
Research Education CoreP30AG059303 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Jennifer Jaie Manly · 2018 to 2026
$6.0M
Strategies to Advance the National Research Council's Agenda on Minority AgingR13AG023033 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GUERRERO, LOURDES, POURAT, NADEREH · 2003 to 2023
$1000k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG015272NIA NIH HHS P30 AG022845NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028741NIA NIH HHS P30 AG059303NIA NIH HHS R13 AG023033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In health disparities research, studies often fall short of their recruitment goals. Conducting a pilot feasibility study of recruitment in which data are collected systematically on recruitment processes can help investigators refine methods for the larger study. However, there are few guidelines for conducting pilot feasibility studies, and recruitment methods are seldom the focus. Feasibility indicators differ from traditional reports of recruitment results by focusing on the extent to which recruitment goals are met. Methods: We present an organizing framework for assessing the feasibility of recruitment that includes eight steps, briefly: 1) specify recruitment goals; 2) specify recruitment processes; 3) establish a tracking system for each individual; 4) establish a tracking database for monitoring processes and results; 5) implement recruitment and track each individual's progress; 6) summarize recruitment results; 7) calculate and interpret feasibility measures - were goals met; and 8) if goals were not met, utilize tracking data to modify methods for the larger study. We describe methods within each step, with added details for steps 2-5 (the specific processes). The framework draws from a small literature on recruitment feasibility with a focus on health disparities populations. The guidelines blend well-known methods of recruitment with additional information on calculating feasibility indicators. Conclusions: These guidelines provide a first step in thinking systematically about recruitment feasibility, to advance the field of measuring feasibility. Feasibility indicators also can be used to track the effectiveness of innovative recruitment strategies as part of building the science of recruitment, especially in disparities populations.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionClinical Trials as TopicCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchEthnicityFeasibility StudiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMinority GroupsPilot ProjectsUnited StatesFeasibility StudiesHealth DisparitiesMinority GroupMinority RecruitmentPilot ProjectsRecruitment

Identifiers

PMID33250621
PMCPMC7683033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.