ReviewHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2021
Big data and real-world data-based medicine in the management of hypertension.
Review in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reduction in Albuminuria with Dapagliflozin Exhibits Substantial Interindividual Variability: A Real-World Study Utilizing a Big Data Approach.Balkan medical journal · 2026Observational
- Blood pressure control and treatment status at 1 year after the first health check-up in individuals with observed referral-level blood pressure.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Article
- Article
- Usefulness and caveats of real-world data for research on hypertension and its association with cardiovascular or renal disease in Japan.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024Review
- Blood pressure management to prevent recurrent stroke: current evidence and perspectives.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2024Review
- Big Data Research on Severe Asthma.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2024Article
- Real-World Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Levels and Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes-Results From a Large Registry Cohort in Asia.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- A comparative study assessing the incidence and degree of hyperkalemia in patients on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors versus angiotensin-receptor blockers.Journal of human hypertension · 2022Article
- Real-world big data demonstrates prevalence trends and developmental patterns of myopia in China: a retrospective, multicenter study.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Big data has been a hot topic in medical and healthcare research. Big data in healthcare is considered to comprise massive amounts of information from various sources, including electronic health records (EHRs), administrative or claims data, and data from self-monitoring devices. Biomedical research has also generated a significant portion of big data relevant to healthcare. Other large datasets arise from cohorts that are recruited and followed on the basis of specific questions, although such research questions may later be expanded to enable other investigations. While the availability of big data offers many possibilities for an improved understanding of disease and treatment, the need for careful and productive use of statistical concepts should be kept in mind. Patient data routinely collected via electronic means are called real-world data (RWD) and are becoming common in healthcare research. RWD and big data are not synonymous with each other, but the two terms seem to be used without distinction with respect to observational studies. In this article, we review hypertension-related papers that use big data or RWD. There are many other sources of big data or RWD that are not covered here, each of which may pose special challenges and opportunities. While randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are considered to be the criterion standard for generating clinical evidence, the use of real-world evidence (RWE) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of medical interventions is gaining interest. On-going efforts to make use of RWD to generate RWE for regulatory decisions, as well as the challenges confronted, including reliability (quality) and relevance (fitness for purpose) of data, will also be addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33250517What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.