Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33250462›Full record

ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2021

Anemia in Diabetic Patients Reflects Severe Tubulointerstitial Injury and Aids in Clinically Predicting a Diagnosis of Diabetic Nephropathy.

Kenji Ito, Soichiro Yokota, Maho Watanabe, Yori Inoue, Koji Takahashi, Naoko Himuro, Tetsuhiko Yasuno, Katsuhisa Miyake, Noriko Uesugi, Kosuke Masutani and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kenji ItoDivision of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Japan.
Soichiro YokotaDivision of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Japan.
Maho WatanabeDivision of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Japan.
Yori InoueDivision of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Japan.
Koji TakahashiDivision of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Japan.
Naoko HimuroDivision of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Japan.
Tetsuhiko YasunoDivision of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Japan.
Katsuhisa MiyakeDivision of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Japan.
Noriko UesugiDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Japan.
Kosuke MasutaniDivision of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Japan.
Hitoshi NakashimaDivision of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Japan.
Fukuoka University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective A kidney biopsy is generally performed in diabetic patients to discriminate between diabetic nephropathy (DN) and non-diabetic kidney disease (NDKD) and to provide more specific treatments. This study investigated the impact of anemia on the renal pathology and the clinical course in patients who underwent a kidney biopsy. Methods We reviewed 81 patients with type 2 diabetes who underwent a percutaneous kidney biopsy. Patients were classified into two groups: isolated DN (DN group, n=30) and NDKD alone or concurrent DN (NDKD group, n=51) groups. The laboratory and pathological findings and clinical courses were investigated. Results In the NDKD group, membranous nephropathy was the most common finding (23.5%), followed by IgA nephropathy (17.6%) and crescentic glomerulonephritis (13.7%). In the logistic regression analysis, the absence of severe hematuria and presence of anemia were significantly associated with a diagnosis of DN. Akaike's information criterion (AIC) and net reclassification improvement (NRI) analyses revealed improved predictive performance by adding anemia to the conventional factors (AIC 100.152 to 91.844; NRI 27.0%). The tissues of patients in the DN group demonstrated more severe interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA) than those in the NDKD group (p<0.05) regardless of the rate of global glomerulosclerosis, and IF/TA was related to the prevalence of anemia (odds ratio: 7.31, 95% confidence interval: 2.33-23.00, p<0.01) according to a multivariable regression analysis. Furthermore, the isolated DN group demonstrated a poorer prognosis than the NDKD group. Conclusion DN is associated with anemia because of severe IF/TA regardless of the renal function, and anemia helps clinician discriminate clinically between isolated DN and NDKD.

Indexed as

AnemiaDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NephropathiesGlomerulonephritis, IGABiopsyHumansKidneyinterstitial fibrosisnon-diabetic renal diseasespercutaneous kidney biopsyrenal anemiaretinopathy

Identifiers

PMID33250462
PMCPMC8170246
OpenAlexW3110303366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.