ReviewTrends in pharmacological sciences2021
Developing Insulin Delivery Devices with Glucose Responsiveness.
Review in Trends in pharmacological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Glucose-Responsive Nanomedicine in Diabetes Therapy: Emerging Advances and Clinical Prospects.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- The Efficacy and Safety of Hypoglycemic Agents in the Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Iranian journal of public health · 2025Review
- Review
- An orally administered glucose-responsive polymeric complex for high-efficiency and safe delivery of insulin in mice and pigs.Nature nanotechnology · 2024Article
- Research Progress on Peptide Drugs for Type 2 Diabetes and the Possibility of Oral Administration.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Week-long normoglycaemia in diabetic mice and minipigs via a subcutaneous dose of a glucose-responsive insulin complex.Nature biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Fabrication of Multiple-Channel Electrochemical Microneedle Electrode Array via Separated Functionalization and Assembly Method.Biosensors · 2024Article
- Material design for oral insulin delivery.Med-X · 2023Review
- Microneedle Patches Loaded with Nanovesicles for Glucose Transporter-Mediated Insulin Delivery.ACS nano · 2022Article
- Microneedle-based insulin transdermal delivery system: current status and translation challenges.Drug delivery and translational research · 2022Review
- Emergence of microneedles as a potential therapeutics in diabetes mellitus.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Review
- 100 years on: the impact of the discovery of insulin on clinical outcomes.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2021Review
- Stimuli-responsive transdermal microneedle patches.Materials today (Kidlington, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Individuals with type 1 and advanced type 2 diabetes require daily insulin therapy to maintain blood glucose levels in normoglycemic ranges to prevent associated morbidity and mortality. Optimal insulin delivery should offer both precise dosing in response to real-time blood glucose levels as well as a feasible and low-burden administration route to promote long-term adherence. A series of glucose-responsive insulin delivery mechanisms and devices have been reported to increase patient compliance while mitigating the risk of hypoglycemia. This review discusses currently available insulin delivery devices, overviews recent developments towards the generation of glucose-responsive delivery systems, and provides commentary on the opportunities and barriers ahead regarding the integration and translation of current glucose-responsive insulin delivery designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.