Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33250105›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics2020

The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Adult Anterior Open Bite Study: Patient satisfaction with treatment.

Samuel A Finkleman, Lauren S Todoki, Ellen Funkhouser, Geoffrey M Greenlee, Kelly W Choi, Hsiu-Ching Ko, Hsuan-Fang Wang, Peter A Shapiro, Roozbeh Khosravi, Camille Baltuck and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effectiveness of aligners to correct vertical malocclusions in adult patients : Systematic review.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Treatment acceptance in adult patients with anterior open bite: A National Dental Practice-Based Research Network study.American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 2024
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Samuel A FinklemanPrivate Practice, Seattle, Wash. Electronic address: saf8@uw.edu.
Lauren S TodokiPrivate Practice, Seattle, Wash.
Ellen FunkhouserDivision of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala.
Geoffrey M GreenleeDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.
Kelly W ChoiPrivate Practice, San Francisco, Calif.
Hsiu-Ching KoPrivate Practice, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hsuan-Fang WangDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash; Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Peter A ShapiroDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.
Roozbeh KhosraviDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.
Camille BaltuckWestern Region, National Dental Practice-Based Research Network, Portland, Ore.
Veerasathpurush AllareddyDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Ill.
Calogero DolceDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.
Chung Hao KauDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala.
Kyungsup ShinDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Jaime de Jesus-VinasPrivate practice, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Michael VermettePrivate practice, Concord, NH.
Cameron JolleyPrivate practice, Trophy Club, Tex.
National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Collaborative Group
Greg J HuangDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.
University of Washington · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USConcord Consortium · USIS practice · BEResearch Network (United States) · USSaft (France) · FRScience Club · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

The National Dental PBRNU19DE022516 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GILBERT, GREGG H · 2012 to 2018
$66.4M
The National Dental PBRN - Administrative CoreU19DE028717 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GILBERT, GREGG H · 2019 to 2025
$23.5M
NIDCR NIH HHS U19 DE022516NIDCR NIH HHS U19 DE028717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis article evaluates and reports on the satisfaction of adult patients across the United States who received orthodontic treatment for anterior open bite malocclusion. The factors that influence satisfaction are also described.

methodsPractitioners were recruited from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. On joining the Network, practitioner demographics and information on their practices were acquired. Practitioners enrolled their adult patients in active treatment for anterior open bite. Patient demographics, patient dentofacial characteristics, and details regarding previous and current treatment were collected through questionnaires at enrollment (T1). Pretreatment lateral cephalograms and intraoral frontal photographs were submitted. Treatment performed, and details related to treatment outcome were recorded through questionnaires at the end of active treatment (T2). Posttreatment lateral cephalograms and intraoral frontal photographs were submitted. Patient satisfaction at T2 was assessed using a 5-point Likert-type scale and open-ended responses. Predictive univariate models were developed to evaluate the factors that affect patient satisfaction. Open-ended responses were reviewed for general trends.

resultsT2 data were received for 260 patients, and 248 of these patients completed and returned the patient satisfaction questionnaires. High levels of satisfaction were found in this sample of adult patients receiving treatment for anterior open bite malocclusion. Specifically, 96% of the sample reported being very or somewhat satisfied. Only 10 patients (4%) were not satisfied with the treatment provided or an element of the final result. Successful open bite closure, treatment modality, and certain patient characteristics may affect patient satisfaction. However, there was insufficient power to demonstrate statistical significance because of the very low number of dissatisfied patients. Open-ended responses directly associated with patient satisfaction were received from 23 patients (9%). They relayed positive, neutral, and negative feelings about the treatment received and final results. Additional responses regarding the orthodontic treatment in general, but not specifically linked to patient satisfaction, were received from 119 patients (48%). These comments depict an overwhelmingly positive experience.

conclusionsAdult patients who received orthodontic treatment for anterior open bite malocclusion were generally satisfied with the treatment provided, as well as the final esthetic and functional results.

Indexed as

MalocclusionOpen BiteAdultEsthetics, DentalHumansPatient SatisfactionSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33250105
PMCPMC7709738
OpenAlexW2987486380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.