ArticleBMC medicine2020
Machine learning approaches classify clinical malaria outcomes based on haematological parameters.
Article in BMC medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The role of artificial intelligence (AI) in the elimination of malaria: a systematic literature review.Malaria journal · 2025Pooled it
- Multi-scenario evaluation of federated learning for privacy-preserving malaria prediction with Ghana DHS data.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Antiprotozoal peptide prediction using machine learning with effective feature selection techniques.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Exploiting integrative metabolomics to study host-parasite interactions in Plasmodium infections.Trends in parasitology · 2024Review
- Risk assessment of imported malaria in China: a machine learning perspective.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Quantitative Forecasting of Malaria Parasite Using Machine Learning Models: MLR, ANN, ANFIS and Random Forest.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Smart medical report: efficient detection of common and rare diseases on common blood tests.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- Data harnessing to nurture the human mind for a tailored approach to the child.Pediatric research · 2023Review
- Detection of factors affecting kidney function using machine learning methods.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Machine learning-based risk factor analysis and prevalence prediction of intestinal parasitic infections using epidemiological survey data.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022Article
- Epidemiological characteristics ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Warfarin anticoagulation management during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of internet clinic and machine learning.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Multi-Omics Advancements towardsDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- The association of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio, and lymphocyte to monocyte ratio with post-thrombolysis early neurological outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMalaria is still a major global health burden, with more than 3.2 billion people in 91 countries remaining at risk of the disease. Accurately distinguishing malaria from other diseases, especially uncomplicated malaria (UM) from non-malarial infections (nMI), remains a challenge. Furthermore, the success of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) is threatened by Pfhrp2/3 deletions and decreased sensitivity at low parasitaemia. Analysis of haematological indices can be used to support the identification of possible malaria cases for further diagnosis, especially in travellers returning from endemic areas. As a new application for precision medicine, we aimed to evaluate machine learning (ML) approaches that can accurately classify nMI, UM, and severe malaria (SM) using haematological parameters.
methodsWe obtained haematological data from 2,207 participants collected in Ghana: nMI (n = 978), SM (n = 526), and UM (n = 703). Six different ML approaches were tested, to select the best approach. An artificial neural network (ANN) with three hidden layers was used for multi-classification of UM, SM, and uMI. Binary classifiers were developed to further identify the parameters that can distinguish UM or SM from nMI. Local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) were used to explain the binary classifiers.
resultsThe multi-classification model had greater than 85% training and testing accuracy to distinguish clinical malaria from nMI. To distinguish UM from nMI, our approach identified platelet counts, red blood cell (RBC) counts, lymphocyte counts, and percentages as the top classifiers of UM with 0.801 test accuracy (AUC = 0.866 and F1 score = 0.747). To distinguish SM from nMI, the classifier had a test accuracy of 0.96 (AUC = 0.983 and F1 score = 0.944) with mean platelet volume and mean cell volume being the unique classifiers of SM. Random forest was used to confirm the classifications, and it showed that platelet and RBC counts were the major classifiers of UM, regardless of possible confounders such as patient age and sampling location.
conclusionThe study provides proof of concept methods that classify UM and SM from nMI, showing that the ML approach is a feasible tool for clinical decision support. In the future, ML approaches could be incorporated into clinical decision-support algorithms for the diagnosis of acute febrile illness and monitoring response to acute SM treatment particularly in endemic settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.