ArticleCognitive neuropsychology2021
Examining speech motor planning difficulties in apraxia of speech and aphasia via the sequential production of phonetically similar words.
Article in Cognitive neuropsychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnosing Apraxia of Speech in Children and Adults When There Is No Gold Standard: A Scoping Review About the Diagnostic Process.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2026Article
- Do People With Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia Improve or Worsen Across Repeated Sequential Word Trials?Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Article
- Acoustic analysis in stuttering: a machine-learning study.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- To Lump or to Split? Possible Subtypes of Apraxia of Speech.Aphasiology · 2020Article
- Apraxia of speech and the study of speech production impairments: Can we avoid further confusion? Reply to Romani (2021).Cognitive neuropsychologyArticle
- How to cut the pie is no piece of cake: Toward a process-oriented approach to assessment and diagnosis of speech sound disorders.International journal of language & communication disordersReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the underlying nature of apraxia of speech (AOS) by testing two competing hypotheses. The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.