Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33249962›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of international medical research2020

Meta-analysis of postoperative antithrombotic therapy after left atrial appendage occlusion.

Shu-Yue Li, Juan Wang, Xiang Hui, Huai-Jun Zhu, Bao-Yan Wang, Hang Xu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of international medical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Incidence and predictors of device-related thrombus after left atrial appendage closure with Watchman device.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shu-Yue LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University Medical School, Jiangsu Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6630-1549
Juan WangDepartment of Pharmacy, Xinjiang Yili Friendship Hospital, Xinjiang Yili China.
Xiang HuiDepartment of Pharmacy, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University Medical School, Jiangsu Nanjing, China.
Huai-Jun ZhuDepartment of Pharmacy, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University Medical School, Jiangsu Nanjing, China.
Bao-Yan WangDepartment of Pharmacy, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University Medical School, Jiangsu Nanjing, China.
Hang XuDepartment of Pharmacy, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University Medical School, Jiangsu Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1100-6566
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CNChina Pharmaceutical University · CNYili Friendship Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis meta-analysis explored the safety and effectiveness of different anticoagulant regimens after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO).

methodsDatabases, such as PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, were searched to identify eligible studies according to the inclusion criteria. The incidences of events, including device-related thrombus (DRT) formation, stroke, systemic thromboembolism, bleeding, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality, were analyzed using R version 3.2.3.

resultsThe screening retrieved 32 studies, including 36 study groups and 4,474 patients. The incidence of outcomes after LAAO was calculated via meta-analysis. In the subgroup analysis, the rates of DRT formation, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality were significantly different among different antithrombotic methods. Single antiplatelet therapy was associated with the highest rate of adverse events, followed by dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) carried lower rates of adverse events.

conclusionsAnticoagulant therapy had better safety and efficacy than antiplatelet therapy. Thus, for patients with nonabsolute anticoagulant contraindications, anticoagulant therapy rather than DAPT should be actively selected. NOACs displayed potential for further development, and these treatments might represent alternatives to VKAs in the future.

Indexed as

Atrial AppendageAtrial FibrillationStrokeAdministration, OralAnticoagulantsFibrinolytic AgentsHumansAnticoagulantsFibrinolytic Agentsantiplatelet therapyantithrombotic strategiesdevice-related thrombusLeft atrial appendage occlusionmeta-analysisoral anticoagulantvitamin K antagonist

Identifiers

PMID33249962
PMCPMC7708721
OpenAlexW3106719290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.