Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33249674›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2022

Individual differences in the encoding of contextual details following acute stress: An explorative study.

Milou S C Sep, Marian Joëls, Elbert Geuze

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Milou S C SepBrain Research and Innovation Centre, Ministry of Defence, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4715-7593
Marian JoëlsDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4826-6209
Elbert GeuzeBrain Research and Innovation Centre, Ministry of Defence, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3479-2379
Utrecht University · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Information processing under stressful circumstances depends on many experimental conditions, like the information valence or the point in time at which brain function is probed. This also holds true for memorizing contextual details (or 'memory contextualization'). Moreover, large interindividual differences appear to exist in (context-dependent) memory formation after stress, but it is mostly unknown which individual characteristics are essential. Various characteristics were explored from a theory-driven and data-driven perspective, in 120 healthy men. In the theory-driven model, we postulated that life adversity and trait anxiety shape the stress response, which impacts memory contextualization following acute stress. This was indeed largely supported by linear regression analyses, showing significant interactions depending on valence and time point after stress. Thus, during the acute phase of the stress response, reduced neutral memory contextualization was related to salivary cortisol level; moreover, certain individual characteristics correlated with memory contextualization of negatively valenced material: (a) life adversity, (b) α-amylase reactivity in those with low life adversity and (c) cortisol reactivity in those with low trait anxiety. Better neutral memory contextualization during the recovery phase of the stress response was associated with (a) cortisol in individuals with low life adversity and (b) α-amylase in individuals with high life adversity. The data-driven Random Forest-based variable selection also pointed to (early) life adversity-during the acute phase-and (moderate) α-amylase reactivity-during the recovery phase-as individual characteristics related to better memory contextualization. Newly identified characteristics sparked novel hypotheses about non-anxious personality traits, age, mood and states during retrieval of context-related information.

Indexed as

HydrocortisoneIndividualityalpha-AmylasesHumansHypothalamo-Hypophyseal SystemMaleSalivaStress, Psychologicalalpha-AmylasesHydrocortisoneHPA-axislife adversitylinear regression analysisrandom forest analysisSAM-axis

Identifiers

PMID33249674
PMCPMC9291333
OpenAlexW3108695295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.