Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33249652›Full record

ArticleProteins2021

Perturbing the energy landscape for improved packing during computational protein design.

Jack B Maguire, Hugh K Haddox, Devin Strickland, Samer F Halabiya, Brian Coventry, Jermel R Griffin, Surya V S R K Pulavarti, Matthew Cummins, David F Thieker, Eric Klavins and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Conformational equilibria in the activation of cystine-knot hormone receptors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ProteinDJ: A high-performance and modular protein design pipeline.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  18. A protein dynamics-based deep learning model enhances predictions of fitness and epistasis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jack B MaguireProgram in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Hugh K HaddoxDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Devin StricklandDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Samer F HalabiyaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Brian CoventryInstitute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jermel R GriffinDepartment of Chemistry, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Surya V S R K PulavartiDepartment of Chemistry, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Matthew CumminsDepartment of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
David F ThiekerDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Eric KlavinsDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Thomas SzyperskiDepartment of Chemistry, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Frank DiMaioDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
David BakerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7896-6217
Brian KuhlmanDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4907-9699

Funding

Integrated Training in Cancer Model SystemsT32CA009156 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DER, CHANNING J. · 1985 to 2020
$19.7M
GPU workstation for deep learning-based protein design and cryo-EM data processingR35GM131923 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BRIAN A KUHLMAN · 2019 to 2026
$6.1M
Protein structure determination from low-resolution experimental dataR01GM123089 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DIMAIO, FRANK P · 2017 to 2025
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009156NCI NIH HHS T32CA009156NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123089NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM123089NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM131923NIGMS NIH HHS R35GM131923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The FastDesign protocol in the molecular modeling program Rosetta iterates between sequence optimization and structure refinement to stabilize de novo designed protein structures and complexes. FastDesign has been used previously to design novel protein folds and assemblies with important applications in research and medicine. To promote sampling of alternative conformations and sequences, FastDesign includes stages where the energy landscape is smoothened by reducing repulsive forces. Here, we discover that this process disfavors larger amino acids in the protein core because the protein compresses in the early stages of refinement. By testing alternative ramping strategies for the repulsive weight, we arrive at a scheme that produces lower energy designs with more native-like sequence composition in the protein core. We further validate the protocol by designing and experimentally characterizing over 4000 proteins and show that the new protocol produces higher stability proteins.

Indexed as

Protein ConformationProtein FoldingProtein StabilityComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsProtein EngineeringProteinsProteinscomputational protein designDe novo protein designenergy landscapeenergy optimizationmassively parallel protein stability measurementsRosetta molecular Modeling program

Identifiers

PMID33249652
PMCPMC8299543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.