Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33249621›Full record

SynthesisAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2021

Systematic review with meta-analysis: the effects of immunomodulator or biological withdrawal from mono- or combination therapy in inflammatory bowel disease.

Dóra Dohos, Lilla Hanák, Zsolt Szakács, Szabolcs Kiss, Andrea Párniczky, Bálint Erőss, Piroska Pázmány, Péter Hegyi, Patrícia Sarlós

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dóra DohosInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-1634-6116
Lilla HanákInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Zsolt SzakácsInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-7035-941X
Szabolcs KissInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Andrea PárniczkyInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Bálint ErőssInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-3658-8427
Piroska PázmányInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Péter HegyiInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-0399-7259
Patrícia SarlósDoctoral School of Clinical Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-5086-9455
University of Pecs · HUHeim Pál Országos Gyermekgyógyászati Intézet · HUUniversity of Szeged · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWithdrawal of treatment is a common therapeutic problem in patients with long-standing remission of inflammatory bowel disease.

aimsTo evaluate the relapse rate in patients with quiescent inflammatory bowel disease after cessation of biologic or immunomodulator therapy.

methodsWe searched five databases for studies evaluating disease relapse after withdrawal of monotherapy or a drug from combination therapy in Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis. In meta-analysis, risk ratios (RR) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

resultsTen randomised controlled trials (587 patients) were included in the meta-analysis, and another nine studies in systematic review. Withdrawal of immunomodulator monotherapy resulted in a significantly higher risk of relapse within 24 months of follow-up compared to ongoing therapy in Crohn's disease, but not in ulcerative colitis (RR = 2.06, CI: 1.53-2.77 and RR = 1.39, CI: 0.85-2.26, respectively). Trial sequential analysis indicated that further studies with similar design are unlikely to change the significant association on relapse rates after withdrawing immunomodulator monotherapy in patients with Crohn's disease. Discontinuation of an immunomodulator from combination with biologics did not show a higher risk of relapse than continuation of both drugs (RR = 1.30, CI: 0.81-2.08). The relapse rate increased after withdrawal of biologic monotherapy, whereas contradictory results were observed after biologic withdrawal from combination regimens.

conclusionContinuing immunomodulator monotherapy should remain the preferred approach among patients with Crohn's disease, although long-term toxicity is a concern. Further randomised controlled trials are warranted in ulcerative colitis and on combination regimens including biologics.

Indexed as

Colitis, UlcerativeCrohn DiseaseInflammatory Bowel DiseasesCombined Modality TherapyHumansImmunologic FactorsImmunologic Factors

Identifiers

PMID33249621
PMCPMC7898479
OpenAlexW3106633624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.