Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33249518›Full record

ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2021

Improved detection of sentinel lymph node metastases allows reliable intraoperative identification of patients with extended axillary lymph node involvement in early breast cancer.

Cristina L Cotarelo, Annemarie Zschöck-Manus, Marcus Schmidt, Arno Schad, Christoph Brochhausen, Charles James Kirkpatrick, Sonja Thaler

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Cristina L CotareloInstitute of Pathology, Heinrich Heine University and University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, D-40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. Cristina.Cotarelo@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Annemarie Zschöck-ManusInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Marcus SchmidtDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Arno SchadInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Christoph BrochhausenInstitute of Pathology, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Charles James KirkpatrickInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Sonja ThalerEuropean Centre for Angioscience (ECAS), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEHeidelberg University · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn improved procedure that allows accurate detection of negative sentinel lymph node (SLN) and of SLN macrometastases during surgery would be highly desirable in order to protect patients from further surgery and to avoid unnecessary costs. We evaluated the accuracy of an intraoperative procedure that combines touch imprint cytology (TIC) and subsequent frozen section (FS) analysis. 2276 SLNs from 1072 patients with clinical node-negative early breast cancer were evaluated during surgery using TIC. Only cytologically-positive SLN were subsequently analysed with a single FS, preserving cytologically-negative SLN for the final postoperative histological diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity and the accuracy of this approach were analysed by comparing the results from intra- and postoperative SLN and axillary node evaluation. This intraoperative method displayed 100% specificity for SLN metastases and was significantly more sensitive for prognostically relevant macrometastases (85%) than for micrometastases (10%). Sensitivity was highest for patients with two or more positive LNs (96%) than for those with only one (72%). 98% of the patients with final pN2a-pN3a were already identified during surgery. Patients who received primary axillary lymph node dissection had significantly more frequent metastases in further LNs (44.6%). Sensitivity was highest for patients with luminal-B, HER2+ and triple negative breast cancer and for any subtype if Ki-67 > 40%. TIC and subsequent FS of cytologically-positive SLNs is highly reliable for detection of SLN macrometastases, and allows accurate identification of patients with a high risk of extended axillary involvement during surgery, as well as accurate histological diagnosis of negative SLN.

Indexed as

Intraoperative CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAxillaBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessPrognosisFrozen sectionMetastasesSentinel lymph nodeTouch imprint cytology

Identifiers

PMID33249518
PMCPMC7882580
OpenAlexW3108215637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.